From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B05CD1396DB for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAA7FE0F46; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-x244.google.com (mail-vk0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E98DE0F23 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-x244.google.com with SMTP id u84so8797287vke.10 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:11:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E0TUyejOYZZsrunHYGDkWNlSwnl8ga9NF6yAUzsT4GQ=; b=TBmMAQu4oPCUr2Tb29k0l0oHLZUBILYGSlx7w2K7ccobT4n+NBei3sZwd+xnUI8WY3 Ixt+z0vt4/4R39fW8otFD92fN4SHvYI7TalGe6BY6i9nBcH9vdHxOoOKO+bVRTCjImhe M/oLxEdirfmKXMaYxGOP5Ln+3nTCvbIDlYJGHkQAgT7xN0wFmUyMS6Z8KhYHgxuFiIOI JFu5ub8AZITVpWLNIpSKLiKnsySGpDU4x6Neec0yIe/GUBSLGV8XBrx89XOCCh6XmWS6 oLON1CL9fbIecv6PzMtWoA1BeW7DBv3WyC5r0kDXow1iBpsQ7oOjAYUDQRnkSlyVwylw aqJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E0TUyejOYZZsrunHYGDkWNlSwnl8ga9NF6yAUzsT4GQ=; b=NICBSp4eDvPS7BeBk4dz9/qlCitmFhypKTdbCX0u2CxXp/j5PuZjw8NLdERDsGVOeM a0jNOgxueTtteOBS7g0c3UHLh0QEPIf2BzJOur0/rBUne5sUsBIEbFpZUednQVNdE84V kHLhK3ssa7AYPNQjfgmFYN93vMyshu2IKCGBYEUdX5cxidvqi+2Mx5bec11Nj8w78KLS OS4w+VYszAsar26vG/JusLn2xx/9zy5/xotVF8NvhUKzNYwC7fVTp+B4Dxk7vwQrg2wi EyE7/nQ+5aZmW8B5P0xkTFVAObOMwVUzxZndST1WXw5qvzzht9Yiexxc9At0JuAKWK21 o8hA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLGbBGH/IUv4IDPaQDCUsmwf4t/atW6IXrAoewBfnTSie12xXI0 Q2rc9Esg5FakJ8iQLemeubHFdG1Mh4vTbEoZKPI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosR9ddu4PLIbsUBkBstFX915PLwIR/VBfVVwPhFkUPCom6EyQqPjO6ZL/0pDYDIF7plEnstonnkOY7I0OmOzlk= X-Received: by 10.31.198.1 with SMTP id w1mr21691845vkf.101.1513573881362; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:11:21 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.40.225 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:11:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20171217092840.GA1759@starlite> References: <20171217092840.GA1759@starlite> From: Hunter Jozwiak Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:11:20 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Loading a Firmware Module By hand? To: Andrey Utkin Cc: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 0586e65f-52d7-4cdd-81fa-ca705c3adcd8 X-Archives-Hash: 91ec0c464ab5ec78983f3d9063ce0587 Hmm. I have kernel 4.14.7 and linux-firmware 20171206. I tried version 999999999 as well, but that didn't help matters, either. Nor did compiling the firmware into the kernel; either 4.14 is too old, or it is too new. I tried copying the firmware my live iso was using, but that didn't help either. On 12/17/17, Andrey Utkin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:34:14AM -0500, Hunter Jozwiak wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have an ath10k_pci device that I'm trying to get hooked to the >> Internet, but I'm having some strange issues. It is trying to load the >> 2.1 firmware, but I don't think that is the proper firmware for the >> interface to have; I think it ought to be loading the 3.0 module, but >> am not quite sure on that either, or how I could go about injecting >> that into the modprobe; I wasn't able to pinpoint the firmware blob >> the ISO was using, so that wasn't much of a pointer in the right >> direction either. I see that the 3.0 blob does exist in >> /lib/firmware/ath10k/QCABLEFAGD/HW3.0, but there are many bin files, > > I have little to no idea about your actual case... But could it be that > you have a recent linux-firmware package (which provides /lib/firmware/ > files) and not recent enough kernel? I think kernel is what decides > which firmware file to load. >