From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E800D138CA4 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D438E083A; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D74EE0810 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com (mail-ig0-f176.google.com [209.85.213.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39E1E340A9C for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iget9 with SMTP id t9so36401241ige.1 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:58:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.23.17 with SMTP id q17mr1271435icb.4.1429912704054; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.124.229 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:58:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <10896.1429908712@ccs.covici.com> References: <12441.1429904241@ccs.covici.com> <10896.1429908712@ccs.covici.com> From: Mike Gilbert Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:58:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] serious problems trying to go to new abi_x86_32 support To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 0c0f19a5-de8d-4867-8af4-01702e9a14b9 X-Archives-Hash: 8f8c43cc2ebe69334a5d9bc90d29e1d4 On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:51 PM, wrote: > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:37 PM, wrote: >> > Hi. So, I am trying to go to the new support for abi_x86_32, so I >> > unmerged all the emul_x86 packages (after doing quickpkg on them, >> > because I am a coward), and then it was complaining that I should run >> > emerge @preserved-rebuild which I did and every time I run that, it >> > gives me another package to change its use flag to add abi_x86_32. >> > After doing some 70 of those (a pain), I get to something which I cannot >> > solve. At some early point portage suggested that I run --newuse >> > --update when doing this, but now I am down to the following: >> > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy >> > ">=sys-apps/systemd-212-r5:0/2[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]" >> > have been masked. >> > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your >> > request: >> > - sys-apps/systemd-9999::gentoo (masked by: package.mask, missing >> > keyword) >> > /etc/portage/package.mask: >> > #need that system because of older kernel >> >> I'm confused. Are you saying that you have sys-apps/systemd in >> /etc/portage/package.mask? > ] > I had to mask off later versions of systemd because I cannot use a > kernel which is required by later versions of systemd. Later than what? What version of systemd do you have installed? There is probably no way to resolve the situation you are in if you cannot rebuild systemd with the appropriate use flags.