From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-162195-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D88F138A1A
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:44:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CB3AE09EF;
Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4794CE09AE
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:44:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (mail-ig0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: floppym)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 142093407EE
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:43:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id l13so25277791iga.0
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.61.201 with SMTP id s9mr31105092igr.0.1424112237195; Mon,
16 Feb 2015 10:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.116.39 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:43:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <mbnlsf$bnu$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <mblfpk$1gv$1@ger.gmane.org>
<20150213231621.ce8b6d5638e2ecaf43d64d67@gentoo.org>
<mbnlsf$bnu$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:43:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP42twfpXK8LVha7dG3gcM9xZm6PiYWYSAFpfzjwjFuC4RA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: repos.conf migration lost overlay priority
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 377d5723-cdfd-4b06-8bb8-361284ea4917
X-Archives-Hash: 01574f3a2e67fd89e1ba2f5783579b2c
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On a side note, someone should inform the portage devs that higher
> priorities should equal lower numbers. Don't do it the opposite way to the
> rest of the world, please :-P
That "someone" could be you. Send mail to
gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org or join us in #gentoo-portage on
IRC.