From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BE213881B for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF96421C03D; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7476A21C029 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com (mail-io0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F3473408DD for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iofb144 with SMTP id b144so21875297iof.1 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:38:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.107.8.212 with SMTP id h81mr32609385ioi.89.1442943519945; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.20.85 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:38:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Mike Gilbert Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:38:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2.21: rsync_excludes no longer taken into account To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: af1a0b7c-443e-48c4-8416-462c81066729 X-Archives-Hash: e6c19367637c301aa90443e919c3bd37 On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Holger Hoffst=C3=A4tte wrote: > > After today's update to ~portage-2.2.21 rsync gives more more than I > asked for on repo update; it seems rsync_excludes is no longer read > or observed. > > It's specified in PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS and of course the file > with the exclusions exists etc. This has worked for aeons. > > Does anybody know what's up here? The release notes don't mention > anything related (or I missed it). rsync has no option called rsync_excludes. Exactly what options are you specifying in PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS?