From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-167626-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BE213881B
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:38:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF96421C03D;
	Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:38:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7476A21C029
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:38:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com (mail-io0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: floppym)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F3473408DD
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:38:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iofb144 with SMTP id b144so21875297iof.1
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.107.8.212 with SMTP id h81mr32609385ioi.89.1442943519945;
 Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.20.85 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2015.09.22.16.28.05@googlemail.com>
References: <pan.2015.09.22.16.28.05@googlemail.com>
From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:38:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ0EP41MFiPY0Be7E5=nze=S_nM5uBUxu+TcEkXm7CtpAT0pcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2.21: rsync_excludes no longer taken into account
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: af1a0b7c-443e-48c4-8416-462c81066729
X-Archives-Hash: e6c19367637c301aa90443e919c3bd37

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Holger Hoffst=C3=A4tte
<holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> After today's update to ~portage-2.2.21 rsync gives more more than I
> asked for on repo update; it seems rsync_excludes is no longer read
> or observed.
>
> It's specified in PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS and of course the file
> with the exclusions exists etc. This has worked for aeons.
>
> Does anybody know what's up here? The release notes don't mention
> anything related (or I missed it).

rsync has no option called rsync_excludes. Exactly what options are
you specifying in PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS?