From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E4C138247 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84A38E0A5B; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49AFAE09EF for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 104123400A4 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id uq10so6045099igb.1 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.67.212 with SMTP id u20mr8336828ici.62.1412718988298; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.111.135 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:56:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201410072248.36414.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> References: <4473472.7D6UrCk1jI@wstn> <4336344.z4OzMqahHB@wstn> <20141007170811.6d8e0e8f@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <201410072248.36414.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:56:28 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Moving the portage tree to /var From: Mike Gilbert To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 9aa9e9ea-3bb6-4d44-aedf-4b91f4a7914c X-Archives-Hash: 2968aeef31a36cfb936c02270f8910b8 On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 17:08:11 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:39:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> > > Check /etc/portage/repos.conf >> > >> > That's it! Many thanks, Bruce. >> >> Indeed. That directory was either empty or absent on all my systems. >> copying repos.conf from /usr/share/portage and modifying the path got rid >> of the message. > > > Shouldn't this file be populated by settings in /etc/portage/make.conf? > > I can't recall editing manually and it seems to have bespoke settings that I > have in make.conf ... > Quite the opposite. Ideally, you should remove the PORTDIR setting from make.conf. repos.conf is the newer, more flexible way to configure it. Unfortunately, that will break some of the third-party portage tools which parse make.conf directly.