From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B774138CA2 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD64DE093B; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D11E0932 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com (mail-ig0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: floppym) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24B9234080E for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbyr2 with SMTP id yr2so95016804igb.0 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:54:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.43.227 with SMTP id z3mr3887814igl.22.1429642470712; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.124.229 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:54:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5536937C.5020003@baums-on-web.de> References: <20150420222222.GA6652@syscon7> <553581FC.3040505@baums-on-web.de> <553590FA.5030702@baums-on-web.de> <5536937C.5020003@baums-on-web.de> From: Mike Gilbert Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:54:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] abi_x86_32 FLAG To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 9380cdba-303a-45a0-b0d1-6d364f387346 X-Archives-Hash: 7fa6f1e7410b75606f0e1d4ef376e3e0 On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am 21.04.2015 um 20:06 schrieb Mike Gilbert: >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: >>> Am 21.04.2015 um 01:27 schrieb Mike Gilbert: >>> >>>> Better yet, upgrade to grub:2 already. >>> >>> Why? As long as grub legacy is working there's no need to upgrade. I'm >>> still running grub legacy, too. >>> >> >> In this context, because you can build it without having any 32-bit >> libs installed. > > That's what grub-static is for. So why would I upgrade to grub:2 if > grub:0 is still working? > Maybe because you don't like running static binaries that were built on somebody else's system. I'm just suggesting grub:2 as an alternative.