Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future directtion ?

[Michael Brinkman <thygreatswaggedone@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1220 bytes --]

I may be misunderstanding, but isn't this cutting back the centralized
development and a pushing for more extensive use of overlays?

To me overlays cause a problem with packages overlapping each other too
much because its the way their maintainers' ebuilds are written.

If anything, I'd suggest continued gentoo centralized development with an
AUR type system that is accessible to gentoo unstable users over the top if
we are just throwing ideas around.

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:34 AM, James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

>
> Here's one, very, very interesting proposals, under
> serious consideration:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distributed_Gentoo
>
>
> I'd be curious what the fine and wonderful folks at
> gentoo_user think of this proposal. Old farts are
> welcome to comment, even encourage to "constructively rant"....
>
>
> excellent topic,
> nowz ur chance to be heard!
>
>
> hth,
> James
>
> :----->
> I'm not sure if Tequila and Rum make me a better dancer, or just
> makes me think that 'taking a risk or 2 on the dance floor'
> is a good thing. Therefore, I need, yet another Caribbean
> Vacation so I can collect more data, and learn of new
> ways to analyze that data    >---3
>
>
>
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1800 bytes --]