From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9E9E158089 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C5B22BC11A; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B792BC10B for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-99c93638322so1037446966b.1 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 12:33:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694460804; x=1695065604; darn=lists.gentoo.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cx2dSIbxnfbGYqZVWExsKdUN75liZj3fB+qEs5BGPFg=; b=lsIAIcEeTWTBwA4M3w6VqFCXaPkj45OcskBHDtfjrLoqHWehD9Srzpbm/96Tgaa7cw KFiTNaYd4JaXE3Y5018KqDyRmVyOaQbA+8MsUhWaoge3lnXfBvrzOR3XaQjvMGmDfUjF VPwetWH3pIil9ptI3otfpaOlz1ptZy25Q5+s3JJjV2HnzZFOTM7wvRR4+sZ9Ei+ewENB /0foAxBu22yFNZeOaV+DMAIKhWxNDylHvtiNEw+eAxvV8ahVQiqCv9bTD/oEev6ZPiVa oAVJ0uef026JhcSpv1LOSvWXCgW249UbKj054sr4AwbS+souvb5zEZii2cb1ONTapvh7 Sg5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694460804; x=1695065604; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cx2dSIbxnfbGYqZVWExsKdUN75liZj3fB+qEs5BGPFg=; b=jKWc3DuSDwAk/19BCfKLYyCtMMnC/IRaCkAUnwzXlzmF1MIu4IC9AxPLKbUnRMHkx2 s6JKn5Ckjx3Mnct37RliOLtXO8xsqKj8PR/ISA3UF9u5HUv4K7gAO+9yeCbLbbZ56UU1 VrREcD7tjaqw9mHbgxH6e1akkFC7TCwy+HY8Si2rjhQz2jksBTR0BcyPtz/MzrqQ2zqy D9hvLd2ORUET4K2zqDJXUzzcVIWzPohSzjJNstcyh4Lo/C9TusvJJa8Q/7lxO0eM4TRz nzcfgQUldCq9H8FFq+Q+lXth4N7GxkybrcvsduKgLZiBeItHCl1auMjdyxdOvIBz88KV xPng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzbkSATIZuYPJsxbSzTYSbpC942SHPN2GSDstEzOfDOpz7VjJya on7r+s7yakr4niMKj5T0n2Jd8RYAPJXIiCitMQRpRMnJNJI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGevOJqUcm4D1l2c89aVU3jEN+a5IKhdY75miEbiNQclI2tv6C6PdondCt3Ab0IIEDYsoVGKij4gTCBsCEEAr4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:304f:b0:9a9:e858:e731 with SMTP id d15-20020a170906304f00b009a9e858e731mr768707ejd.24.1694460804058; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 12:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Siddhanth Rathod Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 01:03:12 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] long compiles To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004fd49606051a66ed" X-Archives-Salt: 8a2c7d46-0db5-49a0-853a-726ff1487730 X-Archives-Hash: 540dbfb2e439c5e38bba0c1d7ffabe18 --0000000000004fd49606051a66ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chromium and qtwebengine have the longest build times that I have encountered On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 at 1:01=E2=80=AFAM, Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > After my long time away from Gentoo, I thought perhaps some packages that > always took ages to compile would have improved. I needed to change to > ~amd64 anyway (dumb n00b mistake leaving it at amd64). So that's what I d= id > and let emerge do it's thing. > > chromium has been building since 10:14, it's now 21:16 and still going so > 9 hours at least on this machine to build a browser - almost as bad as > openoffice at it's worst (regularly took 12 hours). Nodejs also took a > while, but I didn't record time. > > > What other packages have huge build times? > > -- > Alan McKinnon > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com > > > > I have some software you don't likely use that takes a while but one that > is common is qtwebengine or something. If it's not that one, it's qtweb > something. It takes about 4 hours, sometimes 5 or so. > > I think the software takes longer to compile so that we will build new > rigs. ROFL > > Dale > > :-) :-) > --0000000000004fd49606051a66ed Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chromium and qtwebengine have the longest build times tha= t I have encountered=C2=A0

On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 at 1:01=E2=80=AFAM, Dale= <rdalek1967@gmail.com> w= rote:
=20 =20 =20
Alan McKinnon wrote:
=20 =20
After my long time away from Gentoo, I thought perhaps some packages that always took ages to compile would have improved. I needed to change to ~amd64 anyway (dumb n00b mistake leaving it at amd64). So that's what I did and let emerge do it's thing.

chromium has been building since 10:14, it's now 21:16 and still going so 9 hours at least on this machine to build a browser - almost as bad as openoffice at it's worst (regularl= y took 12 hours). Nodejs also took a while, but I didn't record time.


What other packages have huge build times?

--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com


I have some software you don't likely use that takes a while but on= e that is common is qtwebengine or something.=C2=A0 If it's not that = one, it's qtweb something.=C2=A0 It takes about 4 hours, sometimes 5 or = so.=C2=A0

I think the software takes longer to compile so that we will build new rigs.=C2=A0 ROFL=C2=A0

Dale

:-)=C2=A0 :-)=C2=A0
--0000000000004fd49606051a66ed--