From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-144963-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2BF61387FA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat,  2 Feb 2013 15:44:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25DF7E04C1;
	Sat,  2 Feb 2013 15:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f176.google.com (mail-qc0-f176.google.com [209.85.216.176])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE625E0417
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  2 Feb 2013 15:44:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id n41so2143536qco.7
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:44:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=ZJAXQNJ819EvfGHMK9XLOgdrvdPzzzqSzVveooCpfuA=;
        b=H+B3XRkbncScidESNWDm4YUOLuozB72QlQ7C9CyD6U774SaAv0uO56Z2s50O/5Ioom
         gU2f5vcUq0ILE61wb7qLLkpHkXdyyLSjrV9mf79aydkSwfNj6hw7Iasg6FOmWJGfKQ4+
         rDdd6jW8GmL4U8rqLOyJ86nIrKFAf/NjlCNvXFX3Eadn02YKq4EojU9xQygmkVuewVkL
         jsfKvQOyrZK8B5+z76TOglzSlSQeFGJ0nw1T2W2VNNGcPeMTiPDFerb/gq6l1eFlOSfc
         7pWfG7dxRXnCiOx8IQkc29URc5vTlMC1e1zVGxjqtqMJTS39xAK9gkLLmXD6X2i+cj0Y
         DZFQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.195.65 with SMTP id eb1mr16191969qab.83.1359819848620;
 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:44:08 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.104.197 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 07:43:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <510D1A5D.1060203@gentoo.org>
References: <CAHgBc-us9RkoYjHTFr6QVPZqUZ3mumMi5PggVg0G7SXLXa-NAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <510BE4A8.9000505@gmail.com> <510C503F.3010808@iinet.net.au>
 <CAHgBc-tnkpJE5jCz4+ruQQkcGEmAqcUA_064khm2HP=YJREiLg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHgBc-tdLKptzeRL=F=+tpXGrhxqpsgusAuKMPkAo5Kf_w==0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130202132920.62642aef@khamul.example.com> <CAHgBc-tLXWYCCJiBNZvETj2E6mbvypOfEZXLnqOaCWAJB+Jb4w@mail.gmail.com>
 <510D1A5D.1060203@gentoo.org>
From: Nilesh Govindrajan <me@nileshgr.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 21:13:27 +0530
Message-ID: <CAHgBc-vNODxLiH1XyJEd5r98y3WDZNjMP6BwF41MfdC_eZkxhg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] List of base system packages
To: Gentoo User Mailing List <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUTPBTpv8rnNIsGTL/Yi3cBeRak0BxkTzqELd9gQXs7uh6kR6uM1qCZimhPL1bVesF2+I0
X-Archives-Salt: 29e63da0-4602-4d80-9e55-bd77cf46828f
X-Archives-Hash: 1adf2d423ac63fc039292f91615a83a3

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Daniel Pielmeier <billie@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Nilesh Govindrajan schrieb am 02.02.2013 14:42:
>> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Quite interestingly, the ebuild for pam 1.1.5 also checks for 'use
>> hppa', so is it really a bug? :S
>>
>
> pam-1.1.5.ebuild uses EAPI=4 and pam-1.1.6 uses EAPI=5. IIRC there were
> some changes in IUSE calculation between those EAPI's.
>
> So I think this warrants a bug just to clarify this.
>
> Strange thing is pam-1-1-6 compiles fine here and I think it should fail
> anywhere if the above mentioned eapi changes are the reason for this
> failure. Maybe there is something wrong with your configuration.
>

It is a bug. Will file it later on b.g.o. pam 1.1.5 compiled.

--
Nilesh Govindrajan
http://nileshgr.com