From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499D51381F4 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58B9521C00B; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFCBE075C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x40so2154373qcp.40 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:50:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=l9e/yIdgMxcqJJhpxU9pvGFKhFFDUXpRAVbDQcOrvDo=; b=LNFrLEOuyPC3zjNJj7e8OV8+vLR0CIfpOQVJZyJUBc5nKxHekQUwyDMCDLaxzIML9j WPIogW/bHWtEJAOY+abZbVKEoXlb6g2KYKFA7YsgNALL1CRC3Xt6nQmKkMRSgA1tnGHI lMBSoCAVndC5dDlrrQyNZUDkd+XVxgTE5AoeVeyr8Rc3p9zDmaDI8sVRlSPFXwXyOMOu LXPFvkxjs56A3Lu7AX063lDiMV4vh5dcxh3yZtUhtK2Ec6C4Yg5W4ONOyEJ7zBwRoWnI nTx1iq639AcjDw8WCxAujO03DaDRTjG4ejBpg2Fn65BK43bzJOeV+BpN28vyHjCvci6k 5iBQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.136.74 with SMTP id q10mr5988263qct.148.1344847818440; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: me@nileshgr.com Received: by 10.49.72.39 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.72.39 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:50:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:20:18 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: m0_97mVD93d14aK1x0yCaTaKLdU Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Sandbox vs userpriv From: Nilesh Govindrajan To: Gentoo User Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00248c768f367ebf4304c721c81b X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVnkDnQhijARFbP4eiiNHJ231KDUUEX6NDStyIpGW5mj0/yoEKVh4I7nvDW7yc+BLdYTyh X-Archives-Salt: a0a9179d-8427-472f-b494-77545e6f4411 X-Archives-Hash: 938aa378b0d87e0e4ce79115b4419bf3 --00248c768f367ebf4304c721c81b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Aug 13, 2012 2:19 PM, "Nilesh Govindrajan" wrote: > > What's the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of compiling directly with userpriv? *advantage --00248c768f367ebf4304c721c81b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

On Aug 13, 2012 2:19 PM, "Nilesh Govindrajan" <contact@nileshgr.com> wrote:
>
> What's the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of compiling directly with userpriv?

*advantage

--00248c768f367ebf4304c721c81b--