From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-144851-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF74138772
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:40:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30F0121C055;
	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:40:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-f50.google.com (mail-qa0-f50.google.com [209.85.216.50])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A13A521C03B
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:40:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id dx4so536442qab.9
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:40:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=6PY1aVwwiVofEOMLQ6gORcDtt68FnN3abjGi8fn8fRs=;
        b=SmwnFHo1Ukk91Mi5B6zZe9cTHF5KDvfQsMjwmLO3DYLrD6VIDxwuuKkfZ6niBSDuUI
         qSEOUe/5aQjNSxr9a0lOUbIrQ5ssIeErxNgZL+cdacNUEWUsS+sNK2gkk4EIo/x93L3f
         e23qk07aZlzL9raoyvJn3aDzZBDpUq1JWZq/MSrvpqfDsT/CtpvQpuLVR2rufLGTOMw5
         OKmqiiq3+NlwdLQZReiRqQnk/cFUHgGW8N94/oYJvPVbQ1omo1II92d7OM1ZVWaXLyzh
         q6XRMKEt/TUjdagjTCLIzPIgpyrQ0DHT4BtffNfkZc+iMzwzSqCQ5kDrRgzCf5MR9/RN
         VXwQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.195.138 with SMTP id ec10mr5922529qab.3.1359567637743;
 Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.104.197 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:39:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Nilesh Govindrajan <me@nileshgr.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:09:57 +0530
Message-ID: <CAHgBc-uMOTJqQaPYYw2QxLwM0O5KbcOxi7poM=8Busfwgf5pjg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Binary chrome - is it safe in terms of dependencies?
To: Gentoo User Mailing List <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkc/QJOs4CCDxNAvYy2EFH/G7jHmXARWojA154kmAlN9r4ZHBpE5cc1mKiEPsRwNSB0kpX7
X-Archives-Salt: 3507de54-c3c9-4b2f-9a65-4dee42b19294
X-Archives-Hash: 9058eebb5bbc3c304719f1cd7da3baf6

There are two packages of chrome on repository, one is the binary
version officially made available by Google and another is the open
source version chromium.

Since Gentoo updates libraries very quickly, I'm wondering if it is
safe to use the binary version? Has anyone faced library breakages on
this?

Chromium is easily recompiled with new libraries and you don't have a
broken browser, which won't really be the case with the binary
version.

--
Nilesh Govindrajan
http://nileshgr.com