public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francisco Ares <frares@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] (sort of) strange things after upgrading the kernel
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:42:43 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHH9eM6OoYFyBQa14gm5ToBciSCA=yMmUNtbzo0j3eiTjpt4TQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5078D081.1030809@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1740 bytes --]

2012/10/12 Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>

> Francisco Ares wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your reply, Dale.
> >
> > Yes, everything works as expected when using the old kernel.
> >
> > I decided to re-emerge some base libraries, and nothing worked, until
> > I remembered to re-emerge udev. After the build, it announced two
> > wrong lines in the new kernel "config" file:
> >
> > CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y
> > CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y
> >
> > After correcting them and building the kernel again, now everything is
> > back to normal.
> >
> > Thanks again
> > Francisco
> >
> >
> > --
> > "If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then
> > you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and
> > I have one idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have
> > two ideas." - George Bernard Shaw
>
>
> Do you use oldconfig or build each one from scratch?  I use oldconfig so
> that I at least have what I know works.  It's just a matter of if I need
> anything new enabled.  Some claim oldconfig shouldn't be used but I have
> only had it to fail once in the last 10 years or so.  Most everyone I
> know of uses oldconfig.
>
> Glad you got it going tho.
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-)
>
> --
> I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
> how you interpreted my words!
>
>
>

I normally also use oldconfig. I think there might be a reason for it to be
around. But this time I didn't, because the old kernel was version 2.6.39
and I thought oldconfig would mess things up more than help on the new
3.4.9. Don't know how right or wrong is this assumption, though.

I just was lazy to upgrade the kernel, as it takes an hour or so to check
most of menucofig.

Francisco

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2337 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-13  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAHH9eM5+7aCQHe59tvhfSCzX6uAhCHP-7wjQ55YH_irxwoKvMg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-10-12 21:20 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] (sort of) strange things after upgrading the kernel Francisco Ares
2012-10-12 21:56   ` Dale
2012-10-13  1:50     ` Francisco Ares
2012-10-13  2:22       ` Dale
2012-10-13  2:42         ` Francisco Ares [this message]
2012-10-13  3:13           ` Dale
2012-10-14 13:36             ` Francisco Ares
2012-10-14 14:46               ` Dale
2012-10-14 21:54                 ` Peter Humphrey
2012-10-14 22:33                   ` Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHH9eM6OoYFyBQa14gm5ToBciSCA=yMmUNtbzo0j3eiTjpt4TQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=frares@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox