Re: [gentoo-user] has anyone tried KDE5?

[Francisco Ares <frares@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1318 bytes --]

2014-10-07 12:20 GMT-03:00 Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>:

> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote:
> > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote:
> > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months,
> > >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium.
> > >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days
> > >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though
> > >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas)
> > >
> > > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq
> > > in KDE-based distros.  Can somebody comment on how rekonq is doing?
> >
> > I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently
> > after it refused to accept every URL as malformed.
> > Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ;
> > I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox.
> > My window manager is Fluxbox.
>
> I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
> occasionally
> as an Internet browser.  However, I have set it up to use WebKit as its
> browser engine instead of KHTML.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mick
>


Hi,

How did you manage to get WebKit instead of KHTML?  On my version, I can
only see the last.

Thanks, and Best Regards,
Francisco

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2094 bytes --]