From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RZWj2-0002zn-KO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:53:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8921821C0AF; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com (mail-qw0-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B169921C0D3 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qadc12 with SMTP id c12so1511338qad.19 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:51:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xsX1/WaNfYSLrQIZ6STCaS2bz+jpAdk9Uxl3sSOS35k=; b=XSOLG8ewZBuC/UqxPyg+jDD4BAjCqsOQV385mOWo5FL9qVjeq+TEF4s4LwHbz4114I O7q8OTctJkbalBs2oCQI79mRZ1Ew2DGXcKvFAcBQlSxW+JhWL56l+4H9q4kcQiqVJsBd UVbv7VI7R1TmDbaFVtYmGv1GPmJEwS438mUhI= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.1.136 with SMTP id 8mr7412502qaf.54.1323561110253; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:51:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.246.134 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:51:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111210233107.GE5966@eisen.lan> References: <20111210233107.GE5966@eisen.lan> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:51:49 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick and Graphicsmagick blocking each other From: Francisco Ares To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, Frank Steinmetzger Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3074d9dad0b08604b3c595d3 X-Archives-Salt: 5f9845a3-3c05-4bb1-95a6-31d7d8d94ad7 X-Archives-Hash: 17279772c00804d6725ff857d2f62ec7 --20cf3074d9dad0b08604b3c595d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Not sure how, but I have both installed. I recall having some dificulties... Let me look for them Francisco On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Hello, > > a number of packages depend on imagemagick, such as Inkscape, Frescobaldi > and > some LaTeX related stuff. I wanted to take a look at Octave, but this > positively wants graphicsmagick, which is a fork of imagemagick as far as > I can > tell and which conflicts with imagemagick. > > Now some of the named packages can use graphicsmagick, it just comes last > in > the ebuild=E2=80=99s order of dependencies, but some others can=E2=80=99t= . D=E2=80=99ya think this > is > worthy of a bug report, since graphicsmagick even has an imagemagick > useflag? > Perhaps this could be converted into a virtual to make this easier on a > global > scale. > > Or would it be too much dependent upon the individual package? I don=E2= =80=99t know > anything about graphicsmagick really, or its kind of compatibility > implementation. > > Cheers > -- > Gru=C3=9F | Greetings | Qapla' > I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services. > > =E2=80=9CWe all know Linux is great =E2=80=A6 it does infinite loops in 5= seconds.=E2=80=9D > =E2=80=93 Linus Torvalds > --20cf3074d9dad0b08604b3c595d3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi

Not sure how, but I have both installed.=C2=A0 I recall having so= me dificulties... Let me look for them

Francisco

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@gmx.de> wrote:
Hello,

a number of packages depend on imagemagick, such as Inkscape, Frescobaldi a= nd
some LaTeX related stuff. I wanted to take a look at Octave, but this
positively wants graphicsmagick, which is a fork of imagemagick as far as I= can
tell and which conflicts with imagemagick.

Now some of the named packages can use graphicsmagick, it just comes last i= n
the ebuild=E2=80=99s order of dependencies, but some others can=E2=80=99t. = D=E2=80=99ya think this is
worthy of a bug report, since graphicsmagick even has an imagemagick usefla= g?
Perhaps this could be converted into a virtual to make this easier on a glo= bal
scale.

Or would it be too much dependent upon the individual package? I don=E2=80= =99t know
anything about graphicsmagick really, or its kind of compatibility
implementation.

Cheers
--
Gru=C3=9F | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

=E2=80=9CWe all know Linux is great =E2=80=A6 it does infinite loops in 5 s= econds.=E2=80=9D
=C2=A0=E2=80=93 Linus Torvalds

--20cf3074d9dad0b08604b3c595d3--