From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33C21389FE for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 23:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B138CE091B; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 23:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com (mail-qg0-f43.google.com [209.85.192.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A4EE08C5 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 23:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id f51so6529713qge.30 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:52:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=IP5+4JECAdXFp+PzLcIPzPx+35IfZwPcHRB5baQyeco=; b=isRPcpG2eE+1F2U+WQSHYbAoCaaSIV5EyRkA+2yF4yofz6Hr8aownTSyqgR/dV14PE qI9iKKMpQBCWEM4bL/F3zR2Sm8kVoSUDu3xxQb1uN8Lt5uxXxWn+4mgkWQu4iCHs+w0i 9EjwDaSK93GoexeX6mmhJrs1zOW3VLmJ2oxe0BxSUCsASPeI6s1sJGlMiQIGXyAjNKCj pSHm9Bh8KzIkFWjGyEDAqjfMawBH8FvsqigzikHo+cMVGT+9y2XZ4vm6LH9In314QQGw gGHJ1n/EY7wX4X/DcRuqOcpfFAtcAJEO/eAyHIPs41l3IkncaGy+KC9Ned4F46AygI3o N6yQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.30.98 with SMTP id c89mr39456624qgc.90.1414799523577; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.102.134 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:52:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 19:52:03 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7xPcDEBRKiEsERVNVPyzMcak6uc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] NFS server broken again :( From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: d0b15368-b2f7-4fe9-bdec-bea397ef51ee X-Archives-Hash: 5f1f5021b3ef4f4f23970677d01a204d On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Tom H wrote: > > Do you have an example of a service that uses "After=" but doesn't > need a "Requires=" or a "Wants="? I'm either being unimaginative or > plain dumb, but I can't think of any. Some examples I found: smbd.service sshd.service mythbackend.service ntpd.service -- Rich