From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-173996-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 676FD1395E2
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:05:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4880AE0BF5;
Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:05:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com (mail-qk0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA25AE0B8B
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 20:05:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n21so120204178qka.3
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 12:05:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to;
bh=3O9tHmtVAjbHbVyQugTfeUM3u1YblA39eY9Vn8hHH8E=;
b=i0KKzvBixE7oMAv8Unhgl+3doQyGkpZNtTOMYXTVXQa3nPo8J2wlzo5IZzVtx6Yu3Z
lN4wRy9qG2f+QlcCrET24a5AnNvq87Cnsu718qEJf+Qddeforo4PdT+qy3YrE5FfV0K2
snuu80s59NlC0Z9YwWcMZdg9QTdAAgvgtyeIg5OyBXVjlsTGwfwyMWrWQjPpTPmk7rY1
WFh+EBrQQ58sfO/n3cUfailYI6/OVpkF1bY6J/eeD2E0N8C5XNRAlyyxaXUz/VqqrBtG
p691cyAcABaq/bWBYjHv7LESprlmu8YixRA281RWIKDe/797zfLSS6TajRlIG6iho0AG
Z7Wg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=3O9tHmtVAjbHbVyQugTfeUM3u1YblA39eY9Vn8hHH8E=;
b=HydOcOO2gcZ92FUl1ThmlUrXz+Kikij1VxJRwR1r5EkmZvM7b6o7oUiWLxjB8+TdrZ
5WzkqXf3NhI02PTjxyP3av8lDxbUxUjjXfL54tuic+4ycGUovM8vuinZPi+ZbHQzK9w4
hLdOKnNgYMc5Ao/JTc1EgNOVrCSpAksKCk9lngCJqjkmKQ1k5LQpQkZGeau5rDatnVY4
LbRlM9LdHsWbP59XTXsPjQR1KoRMJcPXqHZ/yPVsRlPVqCEi2liXKJ2xsK1/PC6/j+xB
xRSkA+2q+rZmCWLDVRY/d2YfFHW5zDyiide0GfM52lXGpB/UhCeftApVskSqdqHtvduZ
gB2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcKs497EWY/OSjFEAKw9AKPD8J3VNSovWJRWilipiD2uW2PQ5srxbJfLxdJvWbJk7UPzBc1xnLGfyyyqg==
X-Received: by 10.233.239.65 with SMTP id d62mr16434971qkg.122.1478635518935;
Tue, 08 Nov 2016 12:05:18 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.89.83 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 12:05:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20161108193339.6067.3A46E10C@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
References: <8D575227-683B-40C4-9739-DD79F2BCB7AC@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
<602a9ede-2cea-a263-5707-79df18cdefd1@gmail.com> <20161107171349.6150.33DF1A20@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
<87pom6g0s6.fsf@reader.local.lan> <84F423FE-874D-4600-A2A8-7655F3822A86@antarean.org>
<nvsq46$hfp$1@blaine.gmane.org> <20161108155240.66487b78@digimed.co.uk>
<nvst4q$83o$1@blaine.gmane.org> <20161108193339.6067.3A46E10C@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:05:17 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7KQm2uuwzNugPnxMxQrm_QgOB4Y
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_nGi=M_-S5xbhB1cR+aevzggTH96ypW6-j-1vFRJkd-dg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Dynamic IP address services.
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 94f7fb5d-2a96-4681-8e02-226118b1f99a
X-Archives-Hash: 54ceba5be0be75bf072e59318de8f76a
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Ian Zimmerman <itz@primate.net> wrote:
> On 2016-11-08 16:05, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> Republicans have been trying to burn Hillary Clinton at the stake for
>> the past couple years because during her tenure as Secretary of State
>> she and her staff ran used their own mail server rather than use the
>> State Department's email system. [They weren't very good about
>> following backup and archiving procedures.]
>>
>> From what I've read, the State Department's email system was
>> notoriously bad and previous Secretaries of State had also gotten so
>> frustrated with availability and functionality problems that they used
>> outside email systems as well.
>
> Yea, that is my take on it as well - this was a completely manufactured
> controversy. I'd even bet that HRC's server was actually the more
> secure one.
>
Well, I don't handle classified information, but if I had my work
correspondence sent to a personal email address on a server I
maintained, I'd almost certainly be fired for it.
The few folks I've talked to who do handle classified information say
that they would probably face criminal charges, or at least certain
termination, for doing the same.
Is this issue HRC's biggest problem? Hardly. Is it symptomatic of
the larger issues? Certainly.
--
Rich