From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222FF138CCE for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C3B2E0B3E; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com (mail-ig0-f169.google.com [209.85.213.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A71FE0B20; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcau2 with SMTP id au2so59704543igc.1; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 11:23:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=9wuBbo/xIQTUoRa4+EnRIMZfuJ0QxvE7eBWrBR4Unvg=; b=pm2a8BLGMiPDtaXN3R+qWBRv2Yn5Tbrin6FYZdNf4M7jyAYzGW/etRjiu4zJi0Clvm W3nT28+lMiHM5+5/+yHxGLgvFzV8aDkpKvI5y9vMUXHYNi6mQ9vflzRKAB6GCIh6it8+ cLnBJ3nZNu40zFA1jBH+rHlUr3qur8c091Syz3U3Uf6SLUyn/S69Lx8lRBbjgVEGPoCa OOMmO9dYDzhlaXl+NuoaMcSJuyyVLBsXXXSm8y22h7IeUS3CfB7vNbCQ+M43VbZZ77Pb IP4qgyU6zZj1bLpsuNOHvOFQTKVtQ9KYGH/KOePvy5K/WE4z478If16sJfyGr7Yl9E+z vhkA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.14.10 with SMTP id po10mr55704358icb.64.1427653438872; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 11:23:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.48.198 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 11:23:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5517CCCC.90800@seismic.de> <20150329170350.7a622bd1@hal9000.localdomain> <55182380.7010706@seismic.de> <201503291722.00507.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20150329184342.190cdc26@hal9000.localdomain> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 14:23:58 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TMiCc8aXE3RVGYZi56Rq9nUc0ag Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to "full multilib" From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: ae01de87-5cd4-4559-a072-508d088830b4 X-Archives-Hash: 5c83c5b5d04609a14cf71497c3f21363 (crossposting to -dev since this is fairly high-impact) On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 30/03/15 03:43, wabenbau@gmail.com wrote: >> >> I also have dev-qt/qtcore-4.8.5-r2 and some other qt packages installed >> but I had no problems with that. >> >> I'm on gentoo stable (not ~amd64) and I don't use KDE. > > If you're on stable, you'll need to keyword qt-4.8.6 in its entirety. > You can't mix and match versions, and 4.8.6 is the only one that > supports multilib. I think we really need to either stabilize 4.8.6, or backport qtchooser/multilib/etc to the current stable version. qt is a pretty significant package to have break with multilib, and trying to run qt-5 on a stable system is already a nightmare with the qtchooser switch (in my case I ended up abandoning qt5 as I didn't need it that badly). -- Rich