From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Hard drive storage questions
Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 08:59:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_mJBe9DYLmuT_asntsh0ewdsESz1nPHOmLWJEUyKenfpw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554DE7CC.4070707@gmail.com>
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://aws.amazon.com/s3/
>
> I'm trying to figure out just how much this would cost here. o_O Just
> for my pics tho.
>
It works out to 1-3 cents/GB/month, depending on storage tier.
Glacier is cheapest and very secure (or so they claim), but you will
pay more to retrieve the data if you need it. If you aren't using
RAID then I probably wouldn't use glacier since it is very likely that
you'll be doing retrievals on occasion. The most expensive figure
costs you 10c/GB to retrieve, and should be secure (again, their
claims). The in-between figure is for reduced redundancy - it also
costs 10c/GB to retrieve, but is less secure.
I typically use the mid-cost reduced-redundancy option, since this is
intended solely as a backup. If I were archiving data and not keeping
a copy locally I would not use reduced-redundancy. As a backup, it is
already redundant - what are the odds of my house and the Amazon
datacenter having a disaster on the same day? Otherwise, if their
datacenter burns down and the data disappears, then on the next day
duplicity will simply do another full backup and I'm protected again.
One thing you can't cheaply do with Amazon is verify your backups.
Duplicity will happily check the data files against the manifest
hashes with a simple command, but it will cost you 10c/GB for whatever
you verify, since it will need to be transferred out. I guess another
option is to launch an EC2 instance with duplicity on it and have it
do the verify. That would be an internal Amazon transfer which is
both free and much faster, but it will cost you a few cents per hour
for the CPU time. I also don't know if duplicity can verify a backup
without the encryption keys - if it can't then you'll have to upload
your keys to EC2 which means Amazon could read your backups if they
wanted to. Otherwise duplicity is encrypting locally and all Amazon
does is store a bunch of encrypted data and regurgitate it on demand.
--
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-09 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 8:39 [gentoo-user] Hard drive storage questions Dale
2015-04-28 14:49 ` Francisco Ares
2015-04-28 15:01 ` Alan McKinnon
2015-04-28 15:24 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-04-28 17:38 ` Rich Freeman
2015-04-28 18:11 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-04-28 18:31 ` Rich Freeman
2015-04-28 18:41 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-04-28 22:02 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2015-04-29 1:24 ` Rich Freeman
2015-04-29 6:20 ` Alan McKinnon
2015-04-29 14:31 ` Grant Edwards
2015-04-29 6:13 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2015-04-29 7:52 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-05-04 7:39 ` Dale
2015-05-04 7:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-05-04 8:13 ` Mick
2015-05-04 8:26 ` Dale
2015-05-04 8:23 ` Dale
2015-05-04 10:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-05-04 10:40 ` Dale
2015-05-04 11:26 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-05-09 10:56 ` Dale
2015-05-09 12:59 ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2015-05-09 14:46 ` Todd Goodman
2015-05-09 18:16 ` Rich Freeman
2015-05-04 11:35 ` Rich Freeman
2015-05-04 18:42 ` Nuno Magalhães
2015-05-05 6:41 ` Alan McKinnon
2015-05-05 10:56 ` Rich Freeman
2015-05-05 11:33 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-05-05 12:05 ` Mick
2015-05-05 12:21 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-05-05 12:39 ` Mick
2015-05-05 12:53 ` Rich Freeman
2015-05-05 21:50 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-05-05 22:21 ` Bill Kenworthy
2015-05-05 22:33 ` Bill Kenworthy
2015-05-04 10:57 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-04-28 15:02 ` Rich Freeman
2015-05-04 7:23 ` Dale
2015-05-05 3:01 ` Walter Dnes
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-09 1:16 Dale
2018-11-09 1:31 ` Jack
2018-11-09 1:43 ` Dale
2018-11-09 2:04 ` Andrew Lowe
2018-11-09 2:07 ` Bill Kenworthy
2018-11-09 8:39 ` Neil Bothwick
2018-11-09 2:29 ` Rich Freeman
2018-11-09 8:17 ` Bill Kenworthy
2018-11-09 13:25 ` Rich Freeman
2018-11-09 9:02 ` J. Roeleveld
2018-11-11 0:45 ` Dale
2018-11-11 21:41 ` Wol's lists
2018-11-11 22:17 ` Dale
2018-11-09 9:24 ` Wols Lists
2015-04-27 7:41 Dale
2015-04-28 18:25 ` Daniel Frey
2015-04-28 21:23 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGfcS_mJBe9DYLmuT_asntsh0ewdsESz1nPHOmLWJEUyKenfpw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rich0@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox