From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-160291-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64F71389E2
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 03:35:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83CBCE08DF;
Sun, 30 Nov 2014 03:35:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764D4E08A0
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 03:35:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r2so12989834igi.1
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 19:35:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type;
bh=1RTbFtF+G1So4yHxftY1UMLor+bwlrF7c/5UfaZW6RE=;
b=UvQo854E0a+9TlOXVO0emfv10xY29VmJMLYRhuWnS+g59Vzj4Ip7L2fxmsJjuCpmmF
2z8pFhd43qV26stmdBrtw/dU0fN4rx2qlCGPYwFogMRvm9dYNfr3/Xo8yeQEMYSnBPKQ
SnRpTfZXBJGBxdl2NNaYv9VgVC9S3NfOAqn822uuiwzRehj2TwSQp8MPZloR0FfVkuwX
dSzgB3w6vr8uCH6gRcZXom2DaMzp7XgwyYAsXcvjXjLgPATPxCzGWmes7zQvAPJd85bu
9KjFWJ6plDyQkS5pfBmMCnpX9yQbx/c9MM6/3vXSCvo0Ecvk/MaAvuMkzHpVB5Xt58/x
qDvg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.12.234 with SMTP id 103mr45745974iom.71.1417318500761;
Sat, 29 Nov 2014 19:35:00 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.9.80 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 19:35:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <547A7672.7040703@gmail.com>
References: <54791031.7080300@gmail.com>
<1417249143.15251.0@smtp.gmail.com>
<547A7672.7040703@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 22:35:00 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ov6Ama1qk3i_DdoqlShG2OTjkwc
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_kw7nPPyuaMi-jp0J84TYfO=cD+56PTMGFN7+-hMH9osQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Does systemd work with mdadm?
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: d2454ae2-fca3-41a6-a5ff-29a152c768f6
X-Archives-Hash: a3fff1970e22dae71e3db73df435ac76
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Daniel Frey <djqfrey@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So far, it's better than openrc in that there's a bug shutting down an
> imsm raid that's still not been addressed. It causes the array to do a
> rebuild next time it starts up and from my testing systemd doesn't have
> this issue.
>
I can't speak to that particular bug but one of the nice things
systemd does if you're using dracut is that during shutdown systemd
will pivot back to the original initramfs and cleanly unmount root and
so on. This allows a complete shutdown of things like lvm/mdadm/etc
if done properly. When I first started using systemd I actually
noticed the improvements in shutdown more than startup (parallel
openrc is already pretty decent).
--
Rich