From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-158891-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7360B13838B
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:47:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFE39E09AA;
	Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:47:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com (mail-vc0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF384E08D6
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:47:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id im17so5248153vcb.36
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 05:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=phc42JEdf4zpXXEykEi8s4jQgCH5gErCsRv7r28BG84=;
        b=wNUjBxcDilapDSLL/yMJ6L3DQxSyaUieP/X21kGMkObyVf0WjKkPiYzFJAK5cS/q75
         5XutJQhBpSYzG5sW9o8Q6rMf9HGLlu/zPC5AD8W4z4rMJwImCZq1XQwISX0cTdGNEReU
         hE+Hux7gbTMBr5Dokx9pcE/e1DZA9G8DeKizwfnksGa9C7TWbOzwjexZWDuVColXFdqi
         RsOLA4tow2KKFoV4Ca90PSwJ8OfGdf4kexIZQPHznwYu2hNCtez4cTxnM6rzuw3LJ554
         w3qyj6Q7Xf2hLbRkGTHpaABHzjHWgRZ6fpcROzYb302udzKi6EotmVt9c4NDNOpsc15a
         gd7Q==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.88.76 with SMTP id z12mr25593469vcl.14.1411476451754;
 Tue, 23 Sep 2014 05:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.8.229 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 05:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140923115204.GA23337@TranscendTheRubicon.alshain.ring0>
References: <20140923024941.GA2848@waltdnes.org>
	<CAJ1xhMVPaWUnam+ZPp-BBrw=sYSu_BXN_NxdmuMB8ON83o75tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140923115204.GA23337@TranscendTheRubicon.alshain.ring0>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:47:31 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: TdhkbCQL5xak1aHuPZwhrcwbT4o
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_kczFAbMEdQTv_u882+qii7RPzgE1ndiNVYSr+nD9g96Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] "stack-protector-strong" option results in gcc error
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 6c59d957-0af4-4985-81c9-985a218bf5e2
X-Archives-Hash: 5cd844148c97ed62a2b2d45ec83d5af0

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
<h.v.bruinehsen@fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> '-fstack-protector-strong' is supported as of gcc-4.9.x - unless you upgrade,
> you'll forced to use the regular one.
>...
> I think it's not even that unlikely that you don't even want the strong
> version.

Ironically enough, your last sentence overflowed my parsing stack.  :)

--
Rich