From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd-boot on openrc
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 10:54:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_kS+YL9fw7D9pNES958gLHx9n4T+MvKDsA4=YU5BeJpUw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4707210.GXAFRqVoOG@wstn>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 9:03 AM Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 17 April 2022 12:13:06 -00 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> --->8
> > It looks like this is cause my using mixed keywords, amd64 for udev and
> > ~amd64 for systemd-boot/utils. Does keywording udev-250 resolve the
> > blocks?
>
> Yes, after keywording several others, thus:
>
> ~sys-apps/systemd-tmpfiles-249.9
> ~sys-apps/systemd-utils-250.4
> ~sys-fs/udev-250
> ~virtual/tmpfiles-0-r2
>
> But then, after rebooting because of the udev update, systemd-boot-250-r1 has
> come in. I can't revert those keywords though, because then I'd have to ditch
> elogind in favour of systemd. I really do not want to do that.
Can't you just fix your USE flags with systemd-utils? Why revert?
If I need to bump a package up to ~arch temporarily usually I just do
it with an atom like "<sys-apps/systemd-utils-251" or something like
that, so that I keep getting ~arch updates within the major version,
but the next major bump happens when it hits stable. Obviously you
need to understand the versioning/stabilization policies for the
packages involved if you do that, and it is situational, but you
really shouldn't be mixing keywords anyway unless you're comfortable
with that.
--
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-17 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-17 11:41 [gentoo-user] systemd-boot on openrc Peter Humphrey
2022-04-17 12:13 ` Neil Bothwick
2022-04-17 13:03 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-04-17 14:54 ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2022-04-17 15:37 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-04-17 16:42 ` [gentoo-user] " Martin Vaeth
2022-04-17 16:49 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-04-17 17:05 ` Martin Vaeth
2022-04-17 17:25 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-04-17 20:17 ` Rich Freeman
2022-04-18 16:05 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-04-19 2:53 ` Peter Humphrey
2022-04-19 3:00 ` Jack
2022-04-19 6:09 ` Dale
2022-04-19 7:01 ` Neil Bothwick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGfcS_kS+YL9fw7D9pNES958gLHx9n4T+MvKDsA4=YU5BeJpUw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rich0@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox