From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AE91387D3 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0124CE0901; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com (mail-qg0-f48.google.com [209.85.192.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDFBCE0885 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id i50so3096765qgf.7 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 14:34:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Jop2M47O388YMFfVDyX1aivsi60h4XRCCueD4GEvelQ=; b=fcrNs9Hml5MYhCXLrizl7nLOuOtzE5EJQfEiIfeF4QY4EOfqJ6YznyFBpsx9riCQ6d uxMIwGfsZPQ+9uYE5IvsZLwGLso/PhVTw+s/RonXj3hCOQsQKqL8uUWwIqbqqb6RIUo1 G+F8ExLiv339csT9mgf4oVEbXw7aAdrnA7bbIVXTHbHnzP0ApTcQo33sMxdcR4P/BoFQ J8KTeuM7psjaieLJnhZiNYTHshWJKCAQnLzMrnIegXYE5JM5gaUvgzbUYwrW5rBsM/B/ +C/lB3OqTtzGzLHWNo7rDf2zC87ioIYvX3MSGBL2x7bV7cGvJCrABDClAXZu6g2qmNXn St5Q== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.2.135 with SMTP id 7mr27822984qaj.64.1414359295125; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 14:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.102.134 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 14:34:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <544D6144.1050305@googlemail.com> References: <544D4FB6.3030701@googlemail.com> <544D51E6.6030302@alectenharmsel.com> <544D6144.1050305@googlemail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:34:55 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yumaadXlq_T8_EQE9C9y2AgEKWI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] alternative kernels From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: eb6d10c7-8ae7-40d2-a5cb-acc65c4eb6a6 X-Archives-Hash: 47b2f9adf5c53017511671cc0e892aa6 On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Keep your stupid propaganda to yourself. Thank you. > Oh, wonderful, we haven't had a systemd flamewar in a whole week. Please respect the code of conduct. That goes for everybody. While not contrary to the code of conduct, I'd personally appreciate it if everybody didn't decide to turn this into an opportunity to re-hash all the pros and cons of the various init implementations. I'm sure those interested in them won't have to look far back in the archives to find a few hundred posts. -- Rich