From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-156251-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8491381FA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  5 Jun 2014 00:51:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB92AE09F8;
	Thu,  5 Jun 2014 00:51:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f195.google.com (mail-vc0-f195.google.com [209.85.220.195])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8D22E09B0
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  5 Jun 2014 00:51:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f195.google.com with SMTP id ij19so76334vcb.2
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=funxtOpzxwGqbUz6p8f16f0aCYiR5GoAPcm/XurumWI=;
        b=Qi4nQLUaSGgXcZGDc3m90cOIXVqbN5goIAbgzTAhE1SGvp451VFN3VXXiJhLC39wn+
         w1hR3QB+wk3K4lWI+0gYA6V4fKMspyIex61Vx/rNIQO/nTSCD6iuA2LXoQL9dsv4brwV
         sE46DZS7EGYvLtwQHyuRWvEvb3y2ySl1WH/77Qcr6GpVy2QB6vzRppKAVTNKrM6HccPb
         sfwFY1+KlSgps/TFXCFnYq4GOPlOVJ/WWIkwcBIh9moJhznftsVEAiDisbqvkMgaHLiT
         eb1VfpkhbkYUXnG2Qex+hwaZqcf7am247HvyGGoJsxk09JFE+VVjdoi7d43q80ekRvNT
         kfzw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.103.74 with SMTP id fu10mr40703254vdb.7.1401929510050;
 Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.30.227 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 17:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <538FBDCF.6090007@gentoo.org>
References: <20140603161406.0400709b5f38540475ac4c1f@web.de>
	<538DFC41.3080602@libertytrek.org>
	<CADPrc811w=9_MdJ45g9nd2yfYP+jC1HymHg=hG0g+OTvCtTTHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<538E2CBA.4000709@gmail.com>
	<538E37A0.1030105@marc-stuermer.de>
	<538E40E6.8060107@gmail.com>
	<CADPrc82+U=g9+EDmN=amZ9O41MC3nJyvQhoQmmb+73cn+E6MPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOazyz1XZHGX9x+8-5qwDo57ByjkpE+6gCL3iEqhNhfryGHQ3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADPrc82cPF4WftkJC33pprbV+VmvkpqReeck4VJMmVGPDdUcDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<538E591B.4020708@jsbc.cc>
	<538E6F1A.2070209@gmx.us>
	<CADPrc823qUY5C50W64=wZ8CFCEYSY4XbVmFmnuiMaXyEGUNfdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<538E7AEF.9060006@gmx.us>
	<538E7D21.6090907@mackal.net>
	<538E81B1.90101@gmx.us>
	<538E9AF1.3090709@gentoo.org>
	<538F016E.4090606@admin-box.com>
	<538F5358.7020607@gmx.us>
	<538F70C2.1060608@gentoo.org>
	<538FA88A.2000608@gmx.us>
	<CAOazyz2iX0Q6Sy1rzf6TsYY56L5-rwjrAgXM_bjVeEkAb6ydJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<538FB4A9.2000109@gentoo.org>
	<CAOazyz2yqRaukmuEOZWUNBFZRgHjrKoGs2BiPwGvMHMX1k59jQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<538FBDCF.6090007@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 20:51:49 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: o49TgSvfdN82bomZXQ4cxC4RLI0
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_kKZXjP8pTMCqNJLfh3N=ca8CXyLMdemeB+-myySrHi9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 2cd6183f-f91d-4b8a-8cad-db9cc77d43a1
X-Archives-Hash: d1c40e3c0a2802b82b6877b69381bd2a

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On 05/06/14 03:22, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> This effected stable tree of Gentoo as well, pulling undesired
>> different layout into stable is something that should have been
>> avoided. It is about time we split the profiles, systemd is not option
>> for people who runs openrc.
>
> Indeed, I support the idea of having separate systemd profiles too,
> could have simply
> dropped a package.mask entry in base/ then, and then counter-effected it
> in systemd
> profiles

There is apparently an interest in building a profile which doesn't
install openrc (which still needs some work), so you might eventually
get your wish.

Rich