From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-196079-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C06DA1382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 22:32:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADF12E086F;
	Fri, 28 May 2021 22:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oi1-f180.google.com (mail-oi1-f180.google.com [209.85.167.180])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56EE3E084A
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 22:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi1-f180.google.com with SMTP id v22so5761566oic.2
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 15:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=saAkyo5KfeymPRg9QV0OQOIWZSl4u5S0QgGxpyPtvGw=;
        b=E/wnM7/QUrsQjptQIqlaXxW6NskvIKnu7XdsZoYfkwJxgruPGInXeACwEX8wqNTJUl
         DhH03DSsDpr2hlQv1Wfe46qlX/O4mYqU0b1YwCJ6mQEekmE0C7U3iQmorZkxDgYH/gj4
         oDL4+Bt2rsesbQQcu3KHB1t7wXzQQW10iuyhY7yrB5wS6E95rLoP2Q/b18j206Urt6pM
         ND1e0pvwyGoPEWLsHVoxM3sDQFCH/DqmPWtAq5xYbS/qdqhAo6XZW5m6C10Dmaq48rby
         6VxRkBWmmM4kYvPjsndoDNnc7zQWjcpIIxnVGm9MDBoB1nPu7NuR9v0XRi46KwPiH+zr
         +ReA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530yojOW32Q2vfynypbJwkRAwSXHTFymmes+jjiwBpudemPZeFRK
	rStlwkTJyxPiLVZ/jcILmQRrzuox8ZbBAzUqhDJedeRT1cY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzs5eDCZrBfvLq6eFCZFZGNUa/vHXq/Fy//SB8mN4jPcCQ6Cc72CoSGneoSJ2akda94cpWCIbm7QYamfH5xl48=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2004:: with SMTP id q4mr7312205oiw.85.1622241147061;
 Fri, 28 May 2021 15:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0rlVpzdVtB3_elWABg81cEOdN_20rDzO_wcUC3u7Dg4QflmWvg7rZNZJVqVfAcURIuhJZNjAD5Bp61i0ksI8FppiWyJ1auPBuvj8HZ0eEaE=@protonmail.com>
 <48d31a71-65e8-b651-938a-06a2ac3ccba3@mackal.net>
In-Reply-To: <48d31a71-65e8-b651-938a-06a2ac3ccba3@mackal.net>
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 18:32:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_k-34G2wKTu=agJNjmsq_Z6_NFC6HVud39ujU7-+8inAg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] why libera?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: 9e4a4cb8-31ad-4915-95d5-743c1c2704c5
X-Archives-Hash: e3c1c48791b9dbc146060d059065aaab

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 6:10 PM Michael Cook <mcook@mackal.net> wrote:
>
> Tor simply introduce too much chance of abuse. If people didn't abuse
> it, it wouldn't be blocked.
>

Yeah, as much as I love it, this service obviously is going to be
abused, especially for something like IRC.

Really though the main reason they went with Libera was that it was a
much simpler move.  Libera was basically feature-complete, while OFTC
lacks namespaces and channel management features.  They're looking to
change that, but Libera was a drop-in replacement.  Gentoo has a LOT
of IRC channels and managing them all would be painful on OFTC.

You also have the issue of nick collisions.  Having everybody change
nicks would be inconvenient, and chances are there would be collisions
across the networks.  A Gentoo dev can't very well expect somebody on
OFTC to give up their nick that they were using perhaps for many
years.  Libera was new so collisions were unlikely unless it was
intentional abuse.  We did have a case of that, but the Libera admins
were happy to fix that (only one case I've heard of and it was obvious
abuse with many Gentoo nicks being registered to one person).

There was also some discussion about moving to something other than
IRC as a primary communications medium.  The general sense was that
this was going to be more controversial, that alternatives had some
issues, and again Libera was an easy drop-in replacement.

Supporting some other network or technology down the road is always
something that could happen, either as an alternative or primary home.
However, the general sense was that it would make more sense to just
consider that and transition in a more orderly way down the road.

-- 
Rich