From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38FD1387D3 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 20:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B9F4E096A; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 20:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com (mail-qa0-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01E86E08CE for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 20:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id j7so3012661qaq.30 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:20:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NsgcvI1z4Z/H7SaMlIC4THFJPzR7t8e7O/95g3cuVJU=; b=hqLzBK8p9Jn6LC/iMiCDW7NR3C4/B2ZN+VH3ZY5PpgQo6lqANXeBs/PVxh1kmWOL6E Zvto8wt8t0o0uKWpbdR4+2YipHT/IQEv16bwKmafWSOlHMyCKoomHHNvzv7bvs++CBeL g3ivUo7FlKy2SoiRhAZwU1QdldEzMyCeOFYpekj9WX5BJJTmGOBQmDjMxMftRKXx6gKV 8wkrsBJCRl1sMD0hXznayVfpWjTyTM76Ao/JengITeQC5q8MP96Cw+VlrDdPj8R96CeH 26adNVHko6RPaSvW83TCVjFajNKNGQ46q49qEWPsOFxgbA1VS1+4cDpvrJcscBnOgvmb LvMA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.28.195 with SMTP id n3mr12391010qac.12.1414354842168; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.140.102.134 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:20:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 16:20:42 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: rXnPz8E9jfTIn5rF06ozq3UHyiQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] alternative kernels From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: a489f39b-9262-4c7d-ab74-93a2ebe52e46 X-Archives-Hash: 216307185386a887d8c954fdfcd35e67 On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote: > > I've been using vanilla-sources since September 2009, in all my > machines. I use systemd, so having the latest kernel version doesn't > hurt; a new vanilla-sources version is usually ready a few hours after > Linus releases a new kernel, and gentoo-sources takes at least a few > weeks, sometimes more. When was it that you noticed gentoo-sources being that far behind. Generally-speaking vanilla-sources and gentoo-sources tend to be updated within a day or two of a new stable kernel release. Now, stable keywords on gentoo-sources tends to track longterm kernels, so that will be behind ~arch by a few weeks. Maybe if you caught somebody on vacation I could see gentoo-sources lagging a bit, or if there was some debate over whether to include some patch in it... -- Rich