* [gentoo-user] swi-prolog-7.3.7 missing digest
@ 2015-10-01 7:43 Mick
2015-10-01 10:53 ` Rich Freeman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mick @ 2015-10-01 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 265 bytes --]
I saw this last night:
/usr/bin/eclean-dist
* Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
* Missing digest for '/usr/portage/dev-lang/swi-prolog/swi-
prolog-7.3.7.ebuild'
Does it need reporting or will it be OK on the next resync?
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] swi-prolog-7.3.7 missing digest
2015-10-01 7:43 [gentoo-user] swi-prolog-7.3.7 missing digest Mick
@ 2015-10-01 10:53 ` Rich Freeman
2015-10-01 14:04 ` Mick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rich Freeman @ 2015-10-01 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
> I saw this last night:
>
> /usr/bin/eclean-dist
> * Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
> * Missing digest for '/usr/portage/dev-lang/swi-prolog/swi-
> prolog-7.3.7.ebuild'
>
> Does it need reporting or will it be OK on the next resync?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561966
--
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] swi-prolog-7.3.7 missing digest
2015-10-01 10:53 ` Rich Freeman
@ 2015-10-01 14:04 ` Mick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mick @ 2015-10-01 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 517 bytes --]
On Thursday 01 Oct 2015 11:53:09 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I saw this last night:
> >
> > /usr/bin/eclean-dist
> >
> > * Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
> > * Missing digest for '/usr/portage/dev-lang/swi-prolog/swi-
> >
> > prolog-7.3.7.ebuild'
> >
> > Does it need reporting or will it be OK on the next resync?
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561966
Thank you Rich. :-)
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-01 14:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-01 7:43 [gentoo-user] swi-prolog-7.3.7 missing digest Mick
2015-10-01 10:53 ` Rich Freeman
2015-10-01 14:04 ` Mick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox