From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-148116-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F9B1381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:20:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0AC9E0856;
Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:19:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com [209.85.217.170])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B20CE080A
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:19:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id t13so2624956lbd.15
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=WTM+gS2kywda5xF2cjm4Y8kgJ1Kw5v9FnhOt92U9EL4=;
b=ebUtcPOpa7w6wSAO4odaqA+reH5NBTR6ESag678LcSY+1y9bSIFjvv+tkeVteVYz/w
egfvTHqkjG8fDAInYsT+OKHNEAiM+i2EkeFFzV50jQAcEO0TIBLk7xEdHN6IDGzS9hBL
QI9CYaGM8KCc6rhgr3K0LbGe3Fc2us9kQRzMG6lYGh02VeDv1obfmvPQqF7MuD+xBP2O
RI/pwzh1TJBJ72jNAUQXSEaa6ShXvVmG0N8LwK2Rbq9kAtr7Z5ZC+YrBYtWNVZa7a3eS
LJ05HwoIORvflPqhFJyEAHufPWem7g0MmXDIWIzYcAoF1Y6erxTu+s1wCeCvdCoy8Mp0
VmyA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.27.169 with SMTP id u9mr2392864lag.8.1370960385745; Tue,
11 Jun 2013 07:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.10.231 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:19:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGWRaZbCatcxM2d2YGXNGKh9jQC+nE-cWJBceGLUARnoMERJtw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Linux Fiber SAN
From: Nick Khamis <symack@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160a336cb2a6604dee196c8
X-Archives-Salt: 1f853ec9-0fac-4741-b9ae-85fc4d7d1eb0
X-Archives-Hash: a451d7d7aa7e7d30edd9b89df4c1d515
--089e0160a336cb2a6604dee196c8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello Everyone,
Was wondering what people are running these days, and how do they compare
to the 10,000 dollar SAN boxes. We are looking to build a fiber san using
IET and glusterFS, and was wondering what kind of luck people where having
using this approach, or any for that matter.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
--089e0160a336cb2a6604dee196c8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Hello Everyone,<div><br></div><div>Was wondering what peop=
le are running these days, and how do they compare to the 10,000 dollar SAN=
boxes. We are looking to build a fiber san using IET and glusterFS, and wa=
s wondering what kind of luck people where having using this approach, or a=
ny for that matter.</div>
<div><br></div><div style>Kind Regards,</div><div style><br></div><div styl=
e>Nick.</div></div>
--089e0160a336cb2a6604dee196c8--