From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605041381F3 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 13:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1CF6E0D1A; Sun, 26 May 2013 13:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f46.google.com (mail-la0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55200E0A9E for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 13:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id er20so5789091lab.33 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 06:17:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tmT4V/T6RS/J9UIJlt7Ojc9SBWSiVDZW7nmgK+OGAwM=; b=Yj63b5v2hVR57nxA9ejPKpiFw+c3ILz04Y0LfCBO389OzESxd0clorL/lT6F8DAHt4 7rvBhWndZHOWMcfKERLEYWw6grlNw4iF/s6AMhaOcAqqsSpomT2cLGkSVdQEyv8DiSbe xQM053TR2FLo9LWPz94NhbPu88AGPI18Pc2eeSf1tzBgM9mdxvOC5Chqe+4SovhDaG2o 60jouaeLJf9DzYBWnlE9TFo507nOZb/JiQkToutixW3mrK3/PlVb3ZUFScUvGY7AWDL8 jECXEOQPeMVBnSdqou1f5+GSfcUI+pssq70EmXtCiIa9fjtSSRHbd23KMZWBINM5llwj WRRQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.121.42 with SMTP id lh10mr175986lab.12.1369574239556; Sun, 26 May 2013 06:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.92.35 with HTTP; Sun, 26 May 2013 06:17:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:17:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: IP Load Sharing - Per Packet Load Balancing (Linux router) From: Nick Khamis To: gentoo-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 035ecfbe-44ae-430d-bef5-0c4a98bd023a X-Archives-Hash: b215d4a12f5ebf8d09d5ba46882dec7e Any different if the links are VDSL? I have little experience in working with DSL based connections, and was wondering what was possible in terms or bridging/bonding etc.. if anything. N. On 5/25/13, Nick Khamis wrote: > I missed out some crusial info in my last email. As mentioned this > would be two separate DSL services, connected using separate bridges. > I think I am describing more of a link aggregation or bonding.... > > Also assuming that the service providers support bonding of the links.... > > > N. > > On 5/25/13, Nick Khamis wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I am looking to put together a linux router for small business, and >> was wondering if there was anything the suite (using quagga etc..) >> that would allow for load balancing of regular dsl links. Kind of like >> cisco with fast ethernet 0,1 and ip sef. If outgoing and incoming >> traffic could be balanced, it would be great! >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> Nick. >> >