Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

[Nick Cameo <symack@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2770 bytes --]

Just because google does it, does not mean it's right. If you are going to
make a suggestion, please
make it an educated one. For example:

"I prefer RHEL because of it's mature GFS, and CMAN support which is Red
Hat's implementation of
global file system and cluster computing."

Or you could even sound funny saying it but add valuable input
nevertheless. Some thing like:

"I think SLES is the shizaooo for clustering because of it's continued
support of Pacemaker Cluster, DRBD,
GFS, OCFS2 etc...."

Just saying I like something because google does, is not valuable input. To
be honest, it's just as a waste of time
to read as it is to write.

Debian, and Ubuntu are desktop platforms. Yes they are widely used in
production server environments (the slow
ones that is) however, our last experience with Debian squeeze as a whole
(ie, source tree, reliability, performance),
was inhospitable. Dare I say, it was making as nauseated as we would be
behind a Windows machine...

That being said, the OP did not specify the type of cluster. Is he
referring to HPLC (Oscar, Rocks, MPI) or Failover
cluster for certain services such as HTTP, SSH etc.. as is provided by
CMAN, Pacemaker.


What has worked really solid for us due to many factors, and the idea of
being able to build everything from the ground up
is Gentoo, with Pacemaker, GFS, and DRBD. This is for our failover system.

Kind Regards,

Nick from Toronto.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Franklin Wang <touch21st@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Maybe it's intresting, although I prefer to use red hat, suse or ubuntu
> in datacenter as Google. Slackware servers're not very poppular here
>
> On 2014年02月20日 08:14, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
>
> On 20 Feb 2014 05:12, "Franklin Wang" <touch21st@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > and what about slackware for server?
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject:
> > How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?
> > Date:
> > Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800
> > From:
> > Franklin Wang <touch21st@gmail.com>
> > To:
> > gentoo-server@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-cluster@lists.gentoo.org
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm not familiar with gentoo server and cluster. So could you tell me
> > the experience about them? Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Franklin Wang
> >
> >
> >
>
> Gentoo makes the best server os because it's a custom built os where the
> admin knows each and every aspect of the os. Security wise, there are no
> unwanted or unused stuff, so lesser bugs to deal with.
>
> Clustering, well, you can do that using glusterfs
>
>
> --
> skype:touch21st, Gtalk:touch21st, Yahoo/MSN:franklinwang36@yahoo.com,
> Xing/Linkedin:Franklin Wang
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4494 bytes --]