From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-157622-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B16D1391DB
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2014 12:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BE47E094A;
	Fri,  1 Aug 2014 12:00:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com (mail-la0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA6BE08C4
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  1 Aug 2014 12:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id gf5so3107020lab.23
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 05:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=m7bUU2OIuHDcshvfTJbg1xIs3Dh7rwMNMzgyJhB2QXM=;
        b=LO4OUearYmxTBzvEf1/SHrefOUFzvyNsqyzORwdVfHNuXRia+CZZaib6PQaMSXz/pQ
         eCeipabANL06rTtnF07psNU3eI2XbMSJRLc+n3QKdSFdXn/WniXd8n2TAjaMwYqlZ6G1
         L5uaGXQxGuB2PE3c8OQ/mxHdaIia8OAGqY2RIrBc9Hn2pIoDpRvjph8Cf6UVmqm3Y+hB
         OpEmfYZMXW9CZDGdpAdrJRzruIzj1mwvauPyXp1ZwlgBVPst2CIOBcwhPzwR4/NQN9x9
         H5/yxXe0D6MwudX29hOujZCMoSAwCVXzyqdIDie+mhrs+NDV4u1Wxmd/68thBL+T3+UF
         BXjA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.255.36 with SMTP id an4mr4999873lbd.31.1406894401403;
 Fri, 01 Aug 2014 05:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.135.229 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 05:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140801125120.4c7a35ff@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
References: <CAHgBc-vAb=FmT+fQ=gFFsR8NohZgWzm2m-ZgKOGH=Z8UDmRm2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADPrc83nsfFYdQMCX37DhZT18ewfungC3H0UC6uEV_a37eO5UQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1406872796.1957.1.camel@wraeth.id.au>
	<20140801085351.02b6bf18@digimed.co.uk>
	<1406880069.31927.1.camel@nileshgr.com>
	<CAGQH77dMnC4UE4+=xNPqD6EWxz9X8wj6cFtsY4pTV-vQ++3Bkg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140801125120.4c7a35ff@hactar.digimed.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 06:00:01 -0600
Message-ID: <CAGQH77fM8tZSKeMi9stdxAMp7+Vvx4gJBYuH0pnBF1M5AooWxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Compiling for different CPU but same architecture
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jc_Garc=C3=ADa?= <jyo.garcia@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: cc4300cb-78eb-4170-b09a-28e28c32b1af
X-Archives-Hash: aa65801eaeb5984008b6efb5706ec9a4

2014-08-01 5:51 GMT-06:00 Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 05:45:36 -0600, Jc Garc=C3=ADa wrote:
>
>> > systemd-nspawn seems to be interesting. But will it work on my i5?
>> > Because I prefer to use -march=3Dnative. For using distcc I copied all
>> > the flags that gcc selects in march=3Dnative mode to make.conf.
>> >
>> >
>> I don't think what CFLAGS you are using matters for using
>> systemd-nspawn.
>
> If you are using a chroot to build packages for installation on another
> machine, the CFLAGS should be appropriate for the target machine, not the
> build host.
>
Maybe I misinterpreted what he was asking, I was only thinking about
the part of using nspawn as a replacement for chroot, not beyond that,
but you're right.
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> The quickest way to a man's heart is through his sternum.