From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DECC1381F3 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8667EE0A7F; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (mail-oa0-f51.google.com [209.85.219.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81F87E08EA for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id i4so545801oah.38 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AW+IRNItDzpCau8mhdJ3iFUVCM8v1Hd60pkYxQYr5is=; b=Zh+sqAddm1CNLSwzRuVtlHc+nqxggBx4GCckjtv2FYJooLe98D4auIBhP0RTmqh5SY ThVaxXVe7qbLTqbUo5K/JeU9AdcePUv/HNszKV17PnBx+ipSP/Gz74C8dr8CJjylMgdI OcCrB5ytK3f6oLeIPwJgmLNHUAgvutrgp3kiU3Z0hE81nMdUxgabr4vTBWl7YSWQJnzt R2L9ArA3FVqXUpgjRph09nxYw79cs8F81tOy1Yxwf/TOeLw1Kw9dgdTZKmrmKwbvXh/v BQ0ofgkp5FIT2rsGYlyIImIS4z5cX9IdUIP6H88o3EQaxUXN5kIQwhKS9UO9CXV+dvO4 RtAA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.123.82 with SMTP id ly18mr35436793oeb.75.1374663174523; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.21.69 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:52:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130724101357.GA13264@dethkomp> References: <20130724101357.GA13264@dethkomp> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:52:54 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2 From: Pavel Volkov To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d98e534109a04e23fb6c3 X-Archives-Salt: 2f887fcd-3ce9-4692-b05c-859f05271c85 X-Archives-Hash: 3fc37650543757b71a485478bd67bf44 --047d7b5d98e534109a04e23fb6c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Yohan Pereira wrote: > On 24/07/13 at 02:00pm, Pavel Volkov wrote: > > It initially suported set arithmetic (you could writes expressions like > > "@set1+@set2/@set3"), I wonder why it was dropped :) > > Wow thats intresting. What could the / operator possibly do in the case > of sets? > I'm not sure about the correct notation but I think it was intersection. --047d7b5d98e534109a04e23fb6c3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1



On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Yohan Pereira <yohan.pereira@gmail.com> wrote:
On 24/07/13 at 02:00pm, Pavel Volkov wrote:
> It initially suported set arithmetic (you could writes expressions like
> "@set1+@set2/@set3"), I wonder why it was dropped :)

Wow thats intresting. What could the / operator possibly do in the case
of sets?

I'm not sure about the correct notation but I think it was intersection.
--047d7b5d98e534109a04e23fb6c3--