From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7AF138CA2 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 06:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BDCFE0909; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 06:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com (mail-lb0-f179.google.com [209.85.217.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25079E08CD for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 06:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbqq2 with SMTP id qq2so172229709lbb.3 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:30:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MKoexahJW3sLvPicJFpgvYDzO80SRhp9vAqzpZtBtjI=; b=HIR2Io44lmfq464B9hORp8MGq0q+FzMbhpNwMTT7Jy3taSn/zpCoTi847AxDxzxd/G So74p4ZjkNEj7wixAf1O0Teu6AaiUlJB87GQhXUD/QSjYbp82Y8kJ/YlbD0JdR0Tm8rL TpScHvjMRCnqX8etCxE9qXFEhXupyoMoWJXOlACkDP+moBXbgwlnrLMoDyGe4V4AYutH 7ajA4O5Moi11Um0ekYd59stgGs47CHg7lBo9Ymj8szpo2cFRvYm7We3jtjZIVaxMyNnN c7aXwOvY4RsfIPDj81TpP95SUVNaUsE9+bmc7fPjQS3rM3UxYPwWG2vBFB5bLVdinQe8 TlEw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.23.163 with SMTP id n3mr11649623laf.34.1429684213564; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.158.130 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 23:30:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55373B2E.80704@gmail.com> References: <5535E331.1040508@gmail.com> <553734A7.2080608@gmail.com> <55373B2E.80704@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:30:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages From: hydra To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158b9cab0c9fe05144a4be6 X-Archives-Salt: b757c1ea-18d6-4ca5-8505-c9f1480e670a X-Archives-Hash: 038c5151d39c28498eeeffeaddcb1c2c --089e0158b9cab0c9fe05144a4be6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Turns out the virtual is working as designed - see Andreas's post > > above I recall now a discussion on -dev about this ages ago, and a > > consensus emerged then to keep things as they currently are (changing > > it requires much effort and has all manner of effects on the tree). > > The actual rule is: A virtual can (by definition) be stable as soon as > > one of its providers is stable. > > So if we really don't want one of the other packages that satisfies what > the virtual needs, we need to mask the others locally? > > Great. :/ > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546902 --089e0158b9cab0c9fe05144a4be6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>= wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Turns out the virtual is working as designed - see Andreas's post<= br> > above I recall now a discussion on -dev about this ages ago, and a
> consensus emerged then to keep things as they currently are (changing<= br> > it requires much effort and has all manner of effects on the tree). > The actual rule is: A virtual can (by definition) be stable as soon as=
> one of its providers is stable.

So if we really don't want one of the other packages that satisf= ies what
the virtual needs, we need to mask the others locally?

Great.=C2=A0 :/

Dale

:-)=C2=A0 :-)



https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D546902=
--089e0158b9cab0c9fe05144a4be6--