From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8B21381F3 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:30:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25C7421C0FA; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ea0-f181.google.com (mail-ea0-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DDB021C0CA for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 08:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f181.google.com with SMTP id k14so1698470eaa.26 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:28:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kDSjYlNtHvicgUC5CnSmnu2oN4Ap1OWX/TDZuFTY/hE=; b=dp2+m67skGlHLULm3ezJa9lOfn31FQ/U4PJ7xBIPz/cfvN529YXDMzCnyqE2Ycuz5J mROsXrR7YxmuByWcS0JVlvhcOa/iAk6c7EtZKtkQDPnNDL+I1ulkugtyg0jTKXWvo4F4 tev0JszxBCEwuX6zHhU0rqKxCr0PrXU1BBOrmGh2iDVyf8chJGrXVlSQqLfmTRkCW2Or Qui0IM2Ybyf9YxXI9kgFR90hU7ib56zVEwSM129BXagDrX8Y9u7YyU29jIitBgrCGPFO MDgaX/HK5Bl2vjkJOiSQSFLholrU0noLkB7WI5qWRFqUvp+V7MVsmw0sG29XEUkeSEJg 4cuQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.0.71 with SMTP id 47mr29830831eea.19.1356078520716; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:28:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.14.193 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:28:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121221000950.0b59ecf3@kc-sys.chadwicks.me.uk> References: <50CB1942.3020900@gmail.com> <8738z7hgsa.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121216171043.71084070@khamul.example.com> <1471899.4aS5cxynce@localhost> <71538.69680.bm@smtp125.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <20121221000950.0b59ecf3@kc-sys.chadwicks.me.uk> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:28:40 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet? From: Mark David Dumlao To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: b6cefed2-bc7a-4253-9c5b-119ffcd6ff4f X-Archives-Hash: 0f075aa536deeedc3405a85da1dc7cc2 On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:46:33 +0800 > Mark David Dumlao wrote: > >> > >> > A concensus would be good. A right consensus is more likely to get a >> > consensus. This has no bearing on the matters at hand. >> >> /usr as the default prefix for installed packages is the "consensus" >> of the vast majority of packages out there. Why do you think this has >> no bearing on their consideration? > > I'm just pointing out that despite what many seem to state there are > losses and unclear/non forth coming positive reasons or real benefits > to the current apparently to be imposed or your doomed "consensus" of > consolidating data. Once your at multi-user the whole filesystem is one > for all intensive purposes anyway and so much of what you have said is > misleading. It really shouldn't be a difficult problem to fix, it is > just data after all. I'm having trouble understanding the whole paragraph - my English parser must have been broken with my last emerge -uDNtav world. I'd revdep-rebuild, but my /usr is on nfs and rebuilding the binaries there would break them for the other shared clients. ;) -- This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [x] social Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none