From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859551381F3 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB3C021C022; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com (mail-ee0-f47.google.com [74.125.83.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A0921C001 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e51so3602677eek.6 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:58:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=E95YmxwAWgN9DueIfIVis078QM2/ss9NsCqkKfbZEn4=; b=hHWn3IgGtoGdeotSHX9hb9lEw7Eo1ZWKCXejdwTPExAvDlkpjoj+izNCnxDXlnzIEX KVdvK1LJr1XUK3lYPXqb57AoDjlTjG4RImjtZNazoRGZ1oeFAGxRwAlBjLTKtGUD4WrE Lb4p1uVpqC5gvJbyR0k9rU68ZauvlKackvIHSsBxZ5mb6f1mi4moBowgTZZdwDW2BZ2a TePWuLHGywpKT6eekCLto1W4BRVc6Lj27EgUUgSmGiap+ByMXF7gniRKSYzXG2nykh/K XpDVX1lHILGVQWa7RwH7XiDPvZF6fWI975vlSs+W9mHZccdyAfIMmalVtGkNM+racZ31 msHw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.0.71 with SMTP id 47mr56792770eea.19.1356375508265; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:58:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.14.193 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:58:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121224171530.GK26547@server> References: <87txrd6pb3.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121223182037.1553813f@khamul.example.com> <87bodk7lb6.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121224085528.56f535ec@khamul.example.com> <50D85167.9060309@gmail.com> <87hanb60xh.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <50D85F68.609@gmail.com> <20121224164120.GI26547@server> <50D88B55.5030808@gmail.com> <20121224171530.GK26547@server> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 02:58:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet? From: Mark David Dumlao To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 9eef8a1c-2dcf-484e-b6fe-f5012625d26a X-Archives-Hash: 57442ed39ccff57d8464668b22169e53 On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:05:25AM -0600, Dale wrote: >> Bruce Hill wrote: >> >> <<< SNIP >>> >> > No initrd... >> >> YET!!! ROFL >> >> When eudev goes stable, then we can disregard that yet. ;-) >> >> Dale > > devfs still works wonderfully ... for principle, if no other reason, that file > server will *NEVER* have an initrd image You shouldn't need to wait for eudev. Technically any early mount system configured and done _before_ udev should do the trick. I mean, it's not like udev is even *essential* for boot - that we happen to depend on it is just a matter of convenience. Shouldn't be hard to write an rc script that does just that for anyone that hates init thingies bad enough. Just hardcode an n-second sleep and plug in the kernel detected device name. Do rc scripts count as "init thingies"? :) -- This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [x] social Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none