From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE3D1381F3 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C2BCE0B74; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69AA7E0B2F for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 04:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x18so4034421lbi.17 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 21:21:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eahlPUKVQBePn389e02FCJ4NQo52oy/XVpivramNPcA=; b=ISEt+FHSg+e1SgYLM96agEasM+ZtLzcUR7A2sqHqKaygPEu2ACBcYHlbeAskRvZX2m EqOu8si54bZSR5OD0XK+4a4AMueZq3M4LdXh7x2R/MdM5SlcIsaBb2lcc8qRfKAoNo1B KxME/10RBOZYuFZHolTwlqdPJ6JvwWmwfO9V+dArnecIR4eTn+U7QQugEjCudQACVR+t AaL0LCGlBHR5oGvQevvB66r8b3C8Xw1iec+WY/IArB9XARo+XaX8HDkwx6t4lbIyr8ai tfF31De8cCmFDFtwaODLkz+ggyy8dqe0WPOuVHCDXS3inHyf58Shexj/0Ncc7b0IojGR /wdw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.88.74 with SMTP id be10mr18386044lab.4.1380514898702; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 21:21:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.172.138 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 21:21:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130930041408.GA3849@waltdnes.org> References: <20130928003220.GF23408@server> <20130928160159.GA4247@linux1> <20130928190441.GB11317@acm.acm> <20130928211702.46eda062@digimed.co.uk> <20130928210938.GD11317@acm.acm> <20130928233750.55b2683a@digimed.co.uk> <20130929120743.GC3161@acm.acm> <52485106.9070403@googlemail.com> <20130929220615.GB335@waltdnes.org> <5248B0F6.2060504@googlemail.com> <20130930041408.GA3849@waltdnes.org> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:21:38 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 From: Mark David Dumlao To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 3f4098c6-d568-4607-a2fa-d2084f7084b9 X-Archives-Hash: f3b468fc8a290bc0c8a562383aef7a57 On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:00:06AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote >> > * Separate /usr worked fine for AGES, until... Do you see a pattern >> > developing here? >> > >> seperate /usr has stopped working fine AGES AGO. Just some setups were >> lucky enough not to stumble over the wreckage and fall into the shards. > > I.e. the 99% who don't need initramfs before today. Some corner case > exotic setups require complex solutions... no ifs/ands/ors/buts. All > the complaining you hear is from the other 99% who's setup worked just > fine with the simple solution, suddenly finding the complex solution > rammed down their throats. funny. In the Linux community, running an "init thingy" is the 99%. We peeps with our custom kernels and builtin drivers are the 1%. -- This email is: [ ] actionable [x] fyi [ ] social Response needed: [ ] yes [ ] up to you [x] no Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none