From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143909-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7301D1381FB
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9DC321C23C;
	Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:32:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ea0-f175.google.com (mail-ea0-f175.google.com [209.85.215.175])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07A1221C22D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:31:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h11so3959790eaa.20
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:31:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=4mU0wnZZW7lOuDMHAZ9xldvjaAVNPyEdokoTK/Wr60o=;
        b=LuICXsyzBVc3Ao2iKTy/ElyrEAjwlX16w5emPB5BACQ2sUK7HePIuOIja6KLsGUxOp
         XSzDv2DBvNuq1QM5k7MnCA2fX/B3V/SBuRLyyjCcE+ewUKEQqTuL9yGsTnhX4amM2FVX
         CxdxF1dHJ1MJtxfpdsNaRnUhzXqmhPEKK6MyuhMclCStXNuvGZN43dLmRGm5UAbAcJ/i
         0Q62xymGh8838evUyllZkNq9sXNONTvcazaKaYoF/rR5ymdr8APaTzPfIRsEd6uwSjwc
         6OMmRao9Y/KtagvxhCztbzxCMK5nj/kMtC/87taKY/2MCaE0FQO5EABBinPGSccJ3Hxe
         OVqw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.215.194 with SMTP id e42mr79676418eep.32.1356633088591;
 Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:31:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.14.193 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Dec 2012 10:31:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50DC9046.3030005@gmail.com>
References: <87txrd6pb3.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
	<20121223182037.1553813f@khamul.example.com>
	<87bodk7lb6.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
	<20121224085528.56f535ec@khamul.example.com>
	<50D85167.9060309@gmail.com>
	<20121224204817.335033c6@khamul.example.com>
	<50D8B467.4080100@gmail.com>
	<CAK2H+efOgw=gjMd-7b5ftH9KtgehBXcHRiAm4w1x6p5-vry4uQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121224230413.GL26547@server>
	<20121224182907.2bf6d3d6@fuchsia.remarqs.net>
	<20121225020301.GP26547@server>
	<50D911A6.6070500@gmail.com>
	<CAG2nJkO85NTD5F4ocMvO2prCpGKwoNpFp9ndk=_q7Jcf9J=0Fg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50DB612F.1030603@gmail.com>
	<CAG2nJkNu=crPcWh9cfEDj0HXCLUV1H-Nei3D6=Auauv=xcxL_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<50DC73A9.3070807@gmail.com>
	<CAG2nJkOpFosnZ7Hk7kAW1QNiy+NRT9bYh8n1CSoTmuRR71EJ7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<50DC9046.3030005@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:31:28 +0800
Message-ID: <CAG2nJkOYy9jWFb_mewga=idT740vo9ANDfT-HKwbbMUmkLVucg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?
From: Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 6d623e69-cfc0-4770-a4ad-69cbc830eb78
X-Archives-Hash: e69ed357773d767a21e32412914e3991

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I guess Linus is confused to?

In your head, and only in your head, you're agreeing with Linus. Linus
was talking about a different bug entirely from the one you're talking
about.

The bug you're talking about: you go on and on about people saying
that your personal system is broken when it's been working for years.
Again, NOBODY said that. What was said, what you are not able to
refute, is that yes, the case for the / and /usr split IS broken, and
something needs to be done about that moving forward.

> Name calling, lost argument.  No more facts.
I've repeatedly proposed technical solutions to your issues with the
fact that udev is doing something about that and you continue to whine
all night about the bogey-men breaking into your boxes. In fact,
between just you and me, I believe I'm the only one who backed up
anything he said with anything even remotely approaching technical
merit.

1) initramfs. It's not that hard
2) early mount script. It's not that hard.
3) modify your udev ebuild to install to /. It's not that hard.

None of this is being prevented by the vengeful Lennart you're so afraid of.
--
This email is:    [ ] actionable   [ ] fyi        [x] social
Response needed:  [ ] yes          [x] up to you  [ ] no
Time-sensitive:   [ ] immediate    [ ] soon       [x] none