From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7F11381F3 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 04:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A029DE0B0A; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 04:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com (mail-ie0-f174.google.com [209.85.223.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0686E0AA7 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 04:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id qd12so5596758ieb.5 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 21:27:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/nYlQujs1SeTT7vOr1vzi5s310enRrvsPNnfblTq26M=; b=DXwzvbvwhrr9AG6fqNzre4kukmGj6d3lIXgAHKJfmXZ8wEw7A9/RAAiwn5MkKvSCKd Og9C21myBl68+BPH5Crh7EttBv7o/iEQ0R/dE0UDveUKTDNKqJeWhUAd/O65jIB/249K hKAAkpEh+Y8jptsI7f/EZkmJoneHOTPu5KrsFjf/M4o35oS+adeRgkjT4FpauWsB1LYX +DebveCkhZyS+nM7GTe6osKQGBCH1LS47OiMlR2kZmwCvJLfFm7phphrGojngXQn67OZ GgLO4CyH1n/bn9CLObSEgjekfJPt1lxWyEzrHTTxx6lDnvFeoj4J4l7Zs9CcYrITETuZ yQ7Q== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.107.70 with SMTP id ha6mr622314igb.60.1382070462448; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 21:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.158.163 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 21:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:27:42 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] systemd and kernel developers cooperating to turn it into a global cgroup manager? From: Mark David Dumlao To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 84df0760-0a70-4f26-8d24-446731718f43 X-Archives-Hash: 802d519afaf6a163ce75fdbfcc9c81db https://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/733595-all-about-the-linux-kernel-cgroups-redesign Not sure if I read that just right... but since nobody is doing cgroup management besides systemd, in practice the cgroups implementation in Linux wasn't very consistent. So since systemd is doing it, their work is helping shape the kernel's cgroups api? Interesting... -- This email is: [ ] actionable [x] fyi [x] social Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none