From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150536-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949681381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:22:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 667C2E0AB9;
	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:22:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com (mail-oa0-f45.google.com [209.85.219.45])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56FD1E0964
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:22:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id m6so7570011oag.18
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=Yl5OK16Zv+m9FOohqNSnpyVItQrWcN4JEfHVCC5u94U=;
        b=KFeB2M90NKYNg9/eGCLIhdlSSTDt+1ymAsLYsJ8SPySuILzDHdr3/o0o5VVO1OfLnT
         p2Az124P6C2CSfVyqGBPggEeRBJq5u/jTlDFsvIOpmfBG92HQAm8i1PYWH0/A/MbTvzf
         gRcHEcA3gDvG4KzHowyQUmlh3q+ywiJr95dQ2dixN6xN0wA2Y4+xaM49KewAoPFV2LtM
         wB2K+Qxg6sjxcRUXegIFrSq3kTC09bQzd3p0fPaUNTzqaYGo4IhRt88EZ/E3nKI2LAiv
         Pj2NUq3C5Vq6yMosHiOZ6eB6szA0WqZJQtQlSxFZnYy80yTSHuZteYvzlGrlzZLIwVxZ
         0mJw==
X-Received: by 10.60.117.225 with SMTP id kh1mr15140416oeb.15.1378808537847;
 Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.236.69 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2094799.2IPDqlmdT9@wstn>
References: <522DD0A1.5010207@libertytrek.org> <2094799.2IPDqlmdT9@wstn>
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:21:37 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8JjWn2GAMA7ouGUPIZN7z9im6vM
Message-ID: <CAG2jQ8jg6CHCK1ntjeo4Q-dkc7=kMiNpxfHZGL6nT0c6SGORXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: c1055b3d-85a6-4f23-8995-bd9b73952dce
X-Archives-Hash: e234cc58846928238cf55bd1cab257ef

On 10 September 2013 10:13, Peter Humphrey <peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> wrote:
> On Monday 09 Sep 2013 09:44:01 Tanstaafl wrote:
>> Wow... just noticed an update is available which, for me, means it has
>> been stabilized (at least on amd64)...
>
> --->8
>
>> Now to wait a few days to see if there is any breakage to report (not
>> worried about it really, though, since it has actually gotten a ton of
>> testing over the last year or two)...
>
> ...and the first time I use it it falls over! Portage was the only thing
> updated yesterday, so nothing else changed at the same time.
>
> # emerge --sync
>>>> Synchronization of repository 'gentoo' located in '/usr/portage'...
>>>> Starting rsync with rsync://192.168.2.2/gentoo-portage...
>>>> Checking server timestamp ...
> receiving incremental file list
> rsync: mkstemp "/var/tmp/.tmp8KJSYc.AHSsPH" failed: Permission denied (13)

Maybe this

http://bugs.gentoo.org/477682

-- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang