From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949681381F3 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 667C2E0AB9; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com (mail-oa0-f45.google.com [209.85.219.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56FD1E0964 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id m6so7570011oag.18 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:22:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=Yl5OK16Zv+m9FOohqNSnpyVItQrWcN4JEfHVCC5u94U=; b=KFeB2M90NKYNg9/eGCLIhdlSSTDt+1ymAsLYsJ8SPySuILzDHdr3/o0o5VVO1OfLnT p2Az124P6C2CSfVyqGBPggEeRBJq5u/jTlDFsvIOpmfBG92HQAm8i1PYWH0/A/MbTvzf gRcHEcA3gDvG4KzHowyQUmlh3q+ywiJr95dQ2dixN6xN0wA2Y4+xaM49KewAoPFV2LtM wB2K+Qxg6sjxcRUXegIFrSq3kTC09bQzd3p0fPaUNTzqaYGo4IhRt88EZ/E3nKI2LAiv Pj2NUq3C5Vq6yMosHiOZ6eB6szA0WqZJQtQlSxFZnYy80yTSHuZteYvzlGrlzZLIwVxZ 0mJw== X-Received: by 10.60.117.225 with SMTP id kh1mr15140416oeb.15.1378808537847; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.236.69 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:21:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2094799.2IPDqlmdT9@wstn> References: <522DD0A1.5010207@libertytrek.org> <2094799.2IPDqlmdT9@wstn> From: Markos Chandras Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:21:37 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8JjWn2GAMA7ouGUPIZN7z9im6vM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: c1055b3d-85a6-4f23-8995-bd9b73952dce X-Archives-Hash: e234cc58846928238cf55bd1cab257ef On 10 September 2013 10:13, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Monday 09 Sep 2013 09:44:01 Tanstaafl wrote: >> Wow... just noticed an update is available which, for me, means it has >> been stabilized (at least on amd64)... > > --->8 > >> Now to wait a few days to see if there is any breakage to report (not >> worried about it really, though, since it has actually gotten a ton of >> testing over the last year or two)... > > ...and the first time I use it it falls over! Portage was the only thing > updated yesterday, so nothing else changed at the same time. > > # emerge --sync >>>> Synchronization of repository 'gentoo' located in '/usr/portage'... >>>> Starting rsync with rsync://192.168.2.2/gentoo-portage... >>>> Checking server timestamp ... > receiving incremental file list > rsync: mkstemp "/var/tmp/.tmp8KJSYc.AHSsPH" failed: Permission denied (13) Maybe this http://bugs.gentoo.org/477682 -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang