From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SXtws-0007uo-Pt for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 12:48:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57FA8E0978; Fri, 25 May 2012 12:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F44E050E for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 12:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so806884bkc.40 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 05:47:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LyqSzuZde7jReRZZFfOvPcDy0stKlMzQ3ZONj6kTSbE=; b=DFHzVewPAXwxv5i43/V419dNDZey1apBN4fViDAtq1d7JPpNYxahM80WOymFL+rRVZ t7FTtqLeP3Kf0ILAvKKWrypjuqfwG1qUY1rFea4SoegW70K7Jkg9l1BYvmUxruDSdzlM UUlR+KagMqvt4y7JlPDbKuuxAWY58PHr0mmcHKHqtOnihLgR50Pmx0Br0+4CDX5uxEWw H1aL67LXAxpy/IPYM234KncJtLDVtdtp4Mi1SvK4V7wXFk4BcSoJDPMzFU+0qypgj31S M55Q8NjMAGD5CtWbS1Bp1xUr0zLUh9bmZK/sWcMXCx5oTqSehOEwuiYpJ8ftn/PafqLA Vcew== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.148.83 with SMTP id o19mr1350335bkv.96.1337950031188; Fri, 25 May 2012 05:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.231.75 with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 05:47:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120525124136.GA2911@1126.localdomain> References: <20120525124136.GA2911@1126.localdomain> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 13:47:11 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lRbd9mVVCtf0vSuTxZhjagZQXtU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild keeps repeating the same steps From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: ecf4ae31-a4d7-44ac-b0e4-9aca05b0c3c6 X-Archives-Hash: 6f39516e7830e3180f17c2e7c8405f28 On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:41 PM, 1126 wrote: > Hello list! > > When I run revdep-rebuild, it keeps repeating the same steps over and ove= r > again. > > Here is what I mean: > > =A0* Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild > > =A0* Checking reverse dependencies > =A0* Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package updat= e > =A0* will be emerged. > > =A0* Collecting system binaries and libraries > =A0* Generated new 1_files.rr > =A0* Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH > =A0* Generated new 2_ldpath.rr > =A0* Checking dynamic linking consistency > [ 36% ] =A0* =A0 broken /usr/lib32/libavdevice.so.53.4.100 (requires > libpulse-simple.so.0 > libpulse.so.0) > [ 100% ] > =A0* Generated new 3_broken.rr > =A0* Assigning files to packages > =A0* =A0 /usr/lib32/libavdevice.so.53.4.100 -> > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs > =A0* Generated new 4_raw.rr and 4_owners.rr > =A0* Cleaning list of packages to rebuild > =A0* Generated new 4_pkgs.rr > =A0* Assigning packages to ebuilds > =A0* Generated new 4_ebuilds.rr > =A0* Evaluating package order > =A0* Generated new 5_order.rr > =A0* All prepared. Starting rebuild > emerge --complete-graph=3Dy --oneshot =A0 app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-me= dialibs:0 > .......... > Calculating dependencies... done! > >>>> Verifying ebuild manifests > >>>> Emerging (1 of 1) app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 > =A0* emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520.tar.xz RMD160 SHA1 SHA256 size ;-)= ... > [ ok ] >>>> Unpacking source... >>>> Unpacking emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520.tar.xz to > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work >>>> Source unpacked in > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work >>>> Preparing source in > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work ... >>>> Source prepared. >>>> Configuring source in > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work ... >>>> Source configured. >>>> Compiling source in > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/work ... >>>> Source compiled. >>>> Test phase [not enabled]: app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120= 520 > >>>> Install emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 into > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/image/ c= ategory > app-emulation >>>> Completed installing emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 into > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520/image/ > > > =A0* QA Notice: The following files contain runtime text relocations > =A0* =A0Text relocations force the dynamic linker to perform extra > =A0* =A0work at startup, waste system resources, and may pose a security > =A0* =A0risk. =A0On some architectures, the code may not even function > =A0* =A0properly, if at all. > =A0* =A0For more information, see http://hardened.gentoo.org/pic-fix-guid= e.xml > =A0* =A0Please include the following list of files in your report: > =A0* TEXTREL usr/lib32/libx264.so.120 > > >>>> Installing (1 of 1) app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520 >>>> Auto-cleaning packages... > >>>> No outdated packages were found on your system. > > =A0* GNU info directory index is up-to-date. > =A0* Build finished correctly. Removing temporary files... > =A0* You can re-run revdep-rebuild to verify that all libraries and binar= ies > =A0* are fixed. Possible reasons for remaining inconsistencies include: > =A0* =A0 orphaned files > =A0* =A0 deep dependencies > =A0* =A0 packages installed outside of portage's control > =A0* =A0 specially-evaluated libraries > > > It keeps complaining about libavdevice.so and them re-emerges > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20120520. > > > When I would re-run it right now, it would again complain about libavdevi= ce and > would again re-emerge app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs.. > > Has anyone any idea how to fix this? > > Thanks in advance, > Christian. > > This is bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D416751 Bugzilla+search is your friend ;)