From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-130670-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RNBe5-00063N-O8
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:57:02 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E14421C1DB;
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 22:56:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E268821C0C2
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 22:53:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so5950380ywe.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 14:53:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type;
bh=06UbkSorQYyjJIdQWbBnIaQo2blt3RgSKipSExUqlQM=;
b=lOlHS7+FMwpKUtQhRsaosEKSVmYUschLex8w0vSRraJ63LIDshJFV3Q+jWS45mHOob
FDYgK6C8Z7K3LjHLBkYz9aY3FvdQ/BYR+9r0i2Bu0VuuXYPfW1EC2K40wXUv/su37Lhg
fFZkpXUcrC+mMieHMPW7yaYupXC6xglYPkZgc=
Received: by 10.42.158.9 with SMTP id f9mr40520601icx.31.1320619988266; Sun,
06 Nov 2011 14:53:08 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.176.130 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 14:52:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EB70C6D.7050806@binarywings.net>
References: <201111061313.37666.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4EB6B0E9.9010607@binarywings.net>
<20111106175202.4f4f8622@weird.wonkology.org> <201111061907.39004.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
<4EB70C6D.7050806@binarywings.net>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C9rico_Porto?= <ericoporto2008@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:52:47 -0200
Message-ID: <CAG1KTJeT6zpSpt+G9DRE16=09npp434qPm_9uB-yCzFQ_dkkHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] No man page for traceroute?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba21219b48ad4104b118cd56
X-Archives-Salt: 9807b65d-d5a7-4aab-bb76-79242d68763f
X-Archives-Hash: f8032c769bda7d6b8a98c91ad51fa40a
--90e6ba21219b48ad4104b118cd56
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
traceroute --help is still there though.
=C9rico V. Porto
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Florian Philipp <lists@binarywings.net>wrot=
e:
> Am 06.11.2011 20:07, schrieb Mick:
> > On Sunday 06 Nov 2011 16:52:02 Alex Schuster wrote:
> >> Florian Philipp writes:
> >>> Am 06.11.2011 14:13, schrieb Mick:
> >>>> Why would there be no traceroute(8) man page on my laptop?
> >>>>
> >>>> An older x86 box has it and displays it without fuss.
> >>>
> >>> It seems that the man page has been dropped from the package. Only th=
e
> >>> old 2.0.3 version from sourceforge still contains it. I couldn't find
> >>> any mention on on bugs.g.o or traceroute-devel.
> >>
> >> I have traceroute-2.0.18 installed, and I do have the man page.
> >
> > I am getting confused. x86 box has traceroute-2.0.15 with man page,
> while
> > amd_64 box has same version and no man page.
> >
>
> I bet the man-page disappears when you re-emerge traceroute. According
> to changelog, the patch I mentioned in a different message was
> introduced without changing the revision number (it doesn't have to
> because it just fixes a build problem). If you emerged traceroute-2.0.15
> before the patch was applied, you got the man-page. Afterwards, it is los=
t.
>
> Regards,
> Florian Philipp
>
>
--90e6ba21219b48ad4104b118cd56
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div>traceroute --help is still there though.</div><br clear=3D"all">=C9ric=
o V. Porto<br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Florian =
Philipp <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:lists@binarywings.net">list=
s@binarywings.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote=
" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Am 06.11.2011 20:07, schrieb Mick:<br>
> On Sunday 06 Nov 2011 16:52:02 Alex Schuster wrote:<br>
>> Florian Philipp writes:<br>
>>> Am 06.11.2011 14:13, schrieb Mick:<br>
>>>> Why would there be no traceroute(8) man page on my laptop?=
<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> An older x86 box has it and displays it without fuss.<br>
>>><br>
>>> It seems that the man page has been dropped from the package. =
Only the<br>
>>> old 2.0.3 version from sourceforge still contains it. I couldn=
't find<br>
>>> any mention on on bugs.g.o or traceroute-devel.<br>
>><br>
>> I have traceroute-2.0.18 installed, and I do have the man page.<br=
>
><br>
> I am getting confused. =A0x86 box has traceroute-2.0.15 with man page,=
while<br>
> amd_64 box has same version and no man page.<br>
><br>
<br>
I bet the man-page disappears when you re-emerge traceroute. According<br>
to changelog, the patch I mentioned in a different message was<br>
introduced without changing the revision number (it doesn't have to<br>
because it just fixes a build problem). If you emerged traceroute-2.0.15<br=
>
before the patch was applied, you got the man-page. Afterwards, it is lost.=
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">Florian Philipp<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br>
--90e6ba21219b48ad4104b118cd56--