From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RPPX2-0001zY-Uz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:10:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A175321C11B; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9870E21C020 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaen33 with SMTP id n33so7430236iae.40 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:09:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=UNNUL0a9734TkVZUw1+sRSrQIplyVQlmvMnc+tcJ/TQ=; b=M3tgrEiwcjkXb6tOpkDTGkkaUBXLZxsFL2/5Q3sOF458VeikceMM8rvWLnOYf9GB7b F09tPHRc8P1kRs8g6UhAoCC4o7x6spXn2TImc/lGfGslQfllulP6PO12wv6MYuDeCFS0 zvtHh8VkcfuIoBLYAdOXNlaiUyzKw5Z+w22iM= Received: by 10.42.161.196 with SMTP id u4mr7950053icx.31.1321150180089; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:09:40 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.176.130 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:09:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EBF2185.7050801@gmail.com> References: <20111112005129.003a54d3@digimed.co.uk> <4EBF2185.7050801@gmail.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C9rico_Porto?= Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:09:19 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Another hardware thread To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8ae82dde4904b1943fbd X-Archives-Salt: 3410603d-4b86-419a-937e-10d5f307070d X-Archives-Hash: 386495c830ce819d5853386d398e4eb3 --90e6ba6e8ae82dde4904b1943fbd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have a asus board that does some pretty fair work on overclocking, but it had a feature called Everyready, an feature to boot and load a webbrowser or some games in 6 seconds.. But it crashed after the first bios update.. =C9rico V. Porto On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Dale wrote: > masterprometheus wrote: > > Neil Bothwick wrote: >> >> >> I'm thinking >>> Gigabyte for motherboard, based on comments made here in similar >>> >> threads >> >>> (like the one Dale started a while ago). >>> >> >> > I highly recommend Gigabyte. My mobo has been great. Everything runs > cool and stable but I don't overclock either. This mobo will but I just > don't use that feature. > > I'm not saying anything bad about ASUS just that I don't have a lot of > experience with it. I have messed with one once for a friend, He worked > fine and no complaints. I only had it for a couple days tho. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > --90e6ba6e8ae82dde4904b1943fbd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have a asus board that does some pretty fair work on overclocking, b= ut it had a feature called Everyready, an feature to boot and load a webbro= wser or some games in 6 seconds.. But it crashed after the first bios updat= e..

=C9rico V. Porto


On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Dale <= span dir=3D"ltr"><rdalek1967@gma= il.com> wrote:
masterprometheus wrote:

Neil Bothwick wrote:


I'm thinking
Gigabyte for motherboard, based on comments made here in similar
threads
(like the one Dale started a while ago).


I highly recommend Gigabyte. =A0My mobo has been great. =A0Everything runs = cool and stable but I don't overclock either. =A0This mobo will but I j= ust don't use that feature.

I'm not saying anything bad about ASUS just that I don't have a lot= of experience with it. =A0I have messed with one once for a friend, =A0He = worked fine and no complaints. =A0I only had it for a couple days tho.

Dale

:-) =A0:-)


--90e6ba6e8ae82dde4904b1943fbd--