From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-138727-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SZJSs-0005kJ-JV
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 10:15:46 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE50BE0A98;
	Tue, 29 May 2012 10:15:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12D1E07C0
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 May 2012 10:14:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so2786490lbb.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 May 2012 03:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=a67Whu+IvTszzeKv1tDYP4wdTHxQjLilt0ufi5hODlU=;
        b=VbXTcxC6UeWrBRQjz/f/wdnzwsXJfjOF2f0v2VSRoJ/YJnfPjRseO6uzuuYrZWmPY0
         u36N9lsf9xsZPz2+/6jLrcdrA1rsr6e6yws008Sq+amz6ZdimzaiJvmf4wZP2rzVGfL+
         h5QZRJTKv1/PN0nJt9gcmwSNlvZ5nD+E8qCBNm0CsbOd5iSIgGlcuaTFe2j/OO4RWMm+
         kfSfehtT+Jeo5PD2NrBBaCED3As7VVAQDsXC9eRoCj66wI6lZUAvCZi3GkXIeLEovxyA
         D0AVYOwQ1b1VGWx35DmlwvdqZ5aJiwaQ+Kr6aMBw92Vp2xKhC4a5/tR8fOInIzp69lJL
         +qnA==
Received: by 10.152.146.67 with SMTP id ta3mr11645152lab.27.1338286457860;
 Tue, 29 May 2012 03:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.111.230 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2012 03:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FC3DA4E.9030009@xunil.at>
References: <4FC3DA4E.9030009@xunil.at>
From: Andrey Moshbear <andrey.vul@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 06:13:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFnZeoRZK2P172egaqhWGsf=_X-y7-yfhuL4LL2f7ijHV2+Qbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ~gcc-4.7.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: a4354bc3-95c4-4625-a6eb-cf152d37ac06
X-Archives-Hash: 25215c7fad31774c31db101f7053c3df

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <lists@xunil.at> wrote:
>
> As GCC-4.7.0 appeared for ~amd64 now ...
>
> anyone recompiled system or world with it already?
>
> More advantages or disadvantages?
>
> Thanks, Stefan
>

If you're a C++ developer, gcc 4.7 has more c++11 support, the most
important of which is a standards-conforming value of __cplusplus,
allowing you to portably check whether the compiler is standard
C++98(03) or C++11.

--
m0shbear