From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4640158089 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E7BC2BC097; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CDE52BC018 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-403012f27e3so51580865e9.3 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 06:48:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1695044938; x=1695649738; darn=lists.gentoo.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=negZO0F6WFMdO5EmYhXD1KLXn2yc/KFo2L4EQ6LG8Cw=; b=ZjPmp59a+DWaFns4Zkc6uGy/w3yDzHusIzmxahMR4xaZQvTApE/Pn0ha6p8NHB53/P l/iGEREpIsQTOqZvZxtxstFZQ2RBnYpvW5PTBnCScLMtKx5EoJBc0ONxzGZGYDLMVnfH /WH5d5uN5i9vC9+N9UqsYUCJoihAEDvpqD//HEi6/TNg8c6ABrM0w0NOK1qJ2XUsnYfa Lr8ZGhWic4K0VdUcstq3iW7nElZdkbteELs0/lCZk5VCfQgctl2joZK9xBPFx2WzGdSh KyjeAvcA+qq9D+7Nt0VMFIRGWR8p2Opfiy0Uy6xoavApILgXQs+6duxS2Nq4lKMwA1Sk 9MIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695044938; x=1695649738; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=negZO0F6WFMdO5EmYhXD1KLXn2yc/KFo2L4EQ6LG8Cw=; b=jnGvwYJbOvt649wULkt+2KibkwqCgDcSkHgGkQ9WHTAoVb/tPRVZmkR3n1IsQoCerz ClZRiSUOfXtKoPHNtVpn5RsPNHeGrBQdvspgFM1vdwd0OTt/mFup2B8imYbYMMPowwqn Zm+BB93tecJF/JzH2Sc8CkmwSbU5gTv/783q8rD/ggEJBFeNlmwhkW3kVoXkWS4XTiIT tivY8kWvG8cdNpNOT2so/kiZsOrosG42fbTUIegPPw/S63wMNC1H1GPJdgNIq3jJUb8/ NUELsQOgVEERcIwLwQxFhFZMUCa3crOZJ/0l7U8SE4hpMyAnunXw7n2nQvcNS0P3UYhe 1Viw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzqU7DHLWcQZt6m4jngPDR7QU/bM3LPGt7/iX1baht2CteG4x0o E2QLaNfSXGMpbogCmEy//JkYayIHVept/Eyz1MGqtoZ8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF4La5hnDC5/KZ/zFMOMFKI3zq/C3FxJ1MD/bPxL5Ps/cKpdQw9B0fX8Svnr/PsQKs0w1Y9ZM2GS+E4llhf0zE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:25a:b0:320:8d7:6c40 with SMTP id m26-20020a056000025a00b0032008d76c40mr4191171wrz.20.1695044937416; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 06:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4531844.LvFx2qVVIh@wstn> <73f47a82-4e46-44fe-a604-c3b8b0fa8b53@users.sourceforge.net> <8292274.T7Z3S40VBb@wstn> In-Reply-To: <8292274.T7Z3S40VBb@wstn> From: Alan McKinnon Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 15:48:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Controlling emerges To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005f83ce0605a267f2" X-Archives-Salt: b7ffdcfa-79bd-4a85-9c30-54ce4d74c1a1 X-Archives-Hash: 13669483e8d5bd4d1db1179124dad5fa --0000000000005f83ce0605a267f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 3:44=E2=80=AFPM Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > It may be less complex than you think, Jack. I envisage a package being > marked > as solitary, and when portage reaches that package, it waits until all > current > jobs have finished, then it starts the solitary package with the > environment > specified for it, and it doesn't start the next one until that one has > finished. > The dependency calculation shouldn't need to be changed. > > It seems simple the way I see it. > How does that improve emerge performance overall? --=20 Alan McKinnon alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com --0000000000005f83ce0605a267f2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 3:44=E2=80=AF= PM Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.my= zen.co.uk> wrote:


It may be less complex than you think, Jack. I envisage a package being mar= ked
as solitary, and when portage reaches that package, it waits until all curr= ent
jobs have finished, then it starts the solitary package with the environmen= t
specified for it, and it doesn't start the next one until that one has = finished.
The dependency calculation shouldn't need to be changed.

It seems simple the way I see it.


How does that improve emerge performance overall? <= br>

--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon = at gmail dot com
--0000000000005f83ce0605a267f2--