From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qt4pG-0004O5-FL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:36:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A10021C448; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vx0-f181.google.com (mail-vx0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E4221C43D for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxi39 with SMTP id 39so5337746vxi.40 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:33:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NtMM/5Kp9aThrJRsRwY0iBvwWJsLznxiNeumz6MhQHk=; b=eC0lsu0PjE+F6rbjTOTUsKCB8t2/KjUGdds2TGNOhMxKfjs3JYp4jSSvB9+VjBXet2 W4vfkQX2Go2f2GZUgB0V7ESWcMBehuzgtkWH6HF8qALMjd91ksX8KuqUtQJyqFnWhowE wZ61cqzyC/DSHUWMdJc8HtzWeeUFL2DS8naKg= Received: by 10.52.23.225 with SMTP id p1mr4130653vdf.186.1313444038075; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.160.1 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:33:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E4957F9.4020505@darkmetatron.de> References: <4E4957F9.4020505@darkmetatron.de> From: Paul Hartman Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:33:38 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FgRSui6-stIp7XjeMzeyy70Og7o Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage autounmask is strange again To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e522cf6492ee062960205c6b132f753c On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Sebastian Be=DFler wrote: > Why is autounmask trying to unmask ExtUtils-ParseXS if it's not needed? > Should I report this as a bug? I think it's only telling you what you should unmask. Setting --autounmask=3Dn simply makes it stop giving you this hint. To actually unmask anything you would need to use --autounmask-write=3Dy Use --tree to get a better idea what package wants the newer ExtUtils-Parse= XS