From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNQE9-0007A1-JV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:03:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FD35E06B0; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC92E06F9 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so1098699lah.40 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=MhtZhHaD+1YVwEcw7Zv79ZIu0362TWZnMiiVhp3UuR0=; b=h16vENnbu0aFtulOTFvD8+tczBv/eZ5zpjAaDkxN8TyeZYwBOhP5gAt1Hz9t6+1CMZ S32elMkTDpVxBRoWAxPEVZfzNZlhvElMvItiO+IJ5gkIc+4jH+ZVkq1rKrEuzG/P09fM 9fQM0xjkhJPPX9/cnWFSKnJ9mT15VRvtP5oVtjuJy1oVN4rbA3mg+XnI82PviAxjymWN RrfJHYPCmscdy58oBzXxxzTUidxtteAIRYcSZ1qe0+u0pSwjCEw0MCORqJYq+A6ZAWa1 sgRAyISNbTd44ltX16ZzEhfSapnDuEqVFMT4gC1CRHk05S8OyQFhTRogTdbbuDZXqfVz kOng== Received: by 10.112.101.162 with SMTP id fh2mr3483625lbb.20.1335452511322; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.35.108 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:01:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Paul Hartman Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:01:31 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kQs7Eb5FaZs2M8dQwW0OrHmGAM4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 45a9808c-e418-47f9-a3b0-772820660305 X-Archives-Hash: d85493dcd55be04b6914dd009c12c9f1 On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > Checking to see if it's a distcc problem, now. If it is, it'll only be > the third time I've ever had issues from distcc, and the first time a > distcc issue resulted in a successful build of a package that broke > things. Just to cover all possibilities... since everyone else is saying it's not a problem for them -- have you run a memory test?