From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658941381F3 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B1B5E0AC1; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com (mail-pd0-f175.google.com [209.85.192.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39EA3E0A72 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 5so749430pdd.34 for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:02:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JUGllFBvwC2vtUg7YA1F3gcYDSZH90gqSSdN+xR3QoQ=; b=xMhRKIpxi/iTJCg0v21PohcToik3nlOpjODGkhjArcmfcjPjmP0OYquF+uHsdl1yx6 2vnM7HgOQEAlelXR1P4CxOfLH6jUBSAJ/flTZLRTV8YfkRjHycFDZvsL+YjfaYvc7ijR Gf1YZJrQv3+0FG9WYavLQYX+rD5Htr8QnB1guNGtbol63/qJ/jxn7sv98DoRcKKv7mI5 sUUF7QUgta6Xi46cCkDw83H60x2wTQtG7gxCXaErw03mjC2PR1dcFzhmSX+bF6IV7L8c l1MwBhS0Z+qX+x2scv1zjfFObnrVWOxyjqTYybmwyFn8UJZ9R+2aBMNNXcQKWzDclFPc enug== X-Received: by 10.67.8.98 with SMTP id dj2mr10980536pad.47.1375455746094; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:02:26 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.50.197 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:02:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51FB963F.702@googlemail.com> References: <20130802104742.GA2423@methusalix> <51FB963F.702@googlemail.com> From: Paul Hartman Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:02:05 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4N8R4O24GAwsw_9GJM4IO27KkvM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Freeze after suspend-to-ram with kernel 3.10 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 2b5412bf-a90b-4e05-a763-b59189590b08 X-Archives-Hash: b4ccc9fcb4fdb4054ac4d2bf8f855eaa On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am 02.08.2013 12:47, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger: >> Hey list >> >> My netbook doesn't freeze so often during operation any more. But now it= =92s >> started to not properly wake up from suspend-to-ram. It=92s like with my= big >> laptop: when that one runs on nouveau instead of nvidia-drivers, it beha= ves >> the very same way, i.e. I switch it on and the screen stays blank. Not e= ven >> sysrq are working then, only hard power-down. >> >> I tried to confirm my oberservation by deliberately hibernating it multi= ple >> times yesterday -- it always woke up with 3.9. Now I booted it with 3.10= and >> it didn't come up on the first try. >> Do you have any suggestion how I might debug this? I can=92t simply repo= rt to >> kernel blokes =933.10 is crap on my netbook, you put in a regression som= ewhere=94. >> >> I don=92t really have the time right now to go after hunches, such as th= e new >> tikless system, as building a kernel takes up to 45 minutes on that thin= g. > well, take your 3.9 config and don't change it. If the config change doesn't reveal anything, you can do git bisect of the kernel to find out which patch broke it. When you do git bisect you don't need to recompile the whole kernel every time, it only compiles the changed files, which are usually not many. So even on a slower machine it's not so bad once the first compile is finished. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Kernel_git-bisect