public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What happened to OpenRC 0.9.6?
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:26:18 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEH5T2P-DCm8ZHpjPH151JgD+XVoGS+AKVQFCxO3nHO8f=_ttA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322588855.15879.3.camel@stretch>

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Albert W. Hopkins
<marduk@letterboxes.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 18:33 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
>> I was just a little surprised that a system package turned out to be
>> completely broken in a scenario that I thought was quite widespread,
>> especially among the devs (as rc_parallel results in _very_ tangible
>> time savings, especially on a desktop with lots of services and
>> frequent
>> boots).
>
> I have desktops and have not seen any noticable difference in startup
> times with rc_parallel.  The config file even says "slight speed"
> improvement, then goes on with a *huge* caveat as if to say "yeah, you
> might see a little difference, but it's probably not worth it for most
> people".
>
> Basically I take that to mean, it *may* speed things up slightly for
> some people.  If it works for you, great for you.  If it breaks, you get
> to pick up the pieces.

I enabled it for a while, ran into a problem once which left my system
unbootable, chrooted from a livecd and disabled it, and never thought
about enabling it again. I usually count my yearly reboots on one
hand, so a few seconds saved to me are not worth my potential minutes
or hours spent fixing it if it goes wrong, in my opinion. For a dev
box or laptop that is booted frequently, that's a different story.
Just not my story. :)



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-29 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-27 15:36 [gentoo-user] What happened to OpenRC 0.9.6? Nikos Chantziaras
2011-11-27 16:22 ` Nilesh Govindarajan
2011-11-27 16:37   ` Florian Philipp
2011-11-27 16:48   ` Dale
2011-11-27 19:28 ` Andrea Conti
2011-11-28 12:29   ` Albert W. Hopkins
2011-11-28 16:15     ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-11-28 16:31       ` Albert W. Hopkins
2011-11-28 16:41         ` Alan McKinnon
2011-11-28 17:19           ` Grant Edwards
2011-11-28 17:37             ` Albert W. Hopkins
2011-11-28 17:22           ` Albert W. Hopkins
2011-11-28 18:28             ` Alan McKinnon
2011-11-29  1:11               ` Dale
2011-11-29  1:41                 ` James Wall
2011-11-29  2:30                   ` Dale
2011-11-29 23:33               ` Walter Dnes
2011-11-28 16:59       ` Florian Philipp
2011-11-28 19:16         ` Nikos Chantziaras
2011-11-28 19:45           ` Michael Mol
2011-11-28 19:57           ` Florian Philipp
2011-11-28 20:49             ` Albert W. Hopkins
2011-11-29 17:33             ` Andrea Conti
2011-11-29 17:47               ` Albert W. Hopkins
2011-11-29 18:12                 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-11-29 18:26                 ` Paul Hartman [this message]
2011-11-29 23:28       ` Walter Dnes
2011-11-30  4:17         ` Peter Humphrey
2011-11-29 23:24   ` [gentoo-user] " Walter Dnes
2011-12-11 10:41 ` Andrea Conti
2011-12-11 18:10   ` James Broadhead
2011-12-11 21:42     ` Michael Orlitzky
2011-12-11 22:48       ` James Broadhead
2011-12-11 22:57         ` Neil Bothwick
2011-12-12  0:29           ` Pandu Poluan
2011-12-12  8:43             ` Alan McKinnon
2011-12-12 22:23               ` Florian Philipp
2011-12-12 23:25                 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-12-13 13:15                   ` Florian Philipp
2011-12-14 13:28     ` Mike Edenfield
2011-12-14 18:59       ` Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEH5T2P-DCm8ZHpjPH151JgD+XVoGS+AKVQFCxO3nHO8f=_ttA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox