From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-140601-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EE71381F4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:51:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 787BBE078C;
	Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:51:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E45E077E
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:49:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lahc1 with SMTP id c1so247093lah.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=SDg5Z78n13+eHfARY0StsK4h8U6EcMGMfr8MoCbxzeM=;
        b=bERHc6jeQtJWMcfghs9MciBbGgOE6Dr4ZAFcz5MM8Di7X5zFN7tAcl+pXVNrNOU53W
         8Ya0tDsQhnHgOi9HAjay+hDomNiKP2o6j6cwkYZF4VkCrvXwzL4j34x+iSutNx4w0bt+
         WQmej+DmNzcaLSONl79vU8A7nl1OFRcnFL8QZR0eKyPrijB+dHfR7SRsM1ShISoWrXfA
         EFTKWdsxmW37ftieZPCkFLDRwf8FIoau+liSpgwb1SqCXAoPXgVydT9u98Ta4yCa7D0O
         fXIAUWjg63W13wj6DNn6LnJgHzH1d++aeUVVfl3TT3JqhdfxTjXz6eUWMoXN81zPVLSw
         bcfA==
Received: by 10.112.88.106 with SMTP id bf10mr8129277lbb.43.1344955782145;
 Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.29.132 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120813231820.GA2758@eisen.fritz.box>
References: <20120813185523.GC30008@eisen.lan> <56063785.rcYNR2xctP@energy> <20120813231820.GA2758@eisen.fritz.box>
From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:49:21 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GlDYVxcux8RDsgMbyFD9GK-Ir6w
Message-ID: <CAEH5T2Nzj5ethEEzA6V=-TE8xtp2Nx0UbrWskOx465=9wsCJ8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Comparison between 32 bit and 64 bit
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: cc48d0ce-4682-4ef1-82f8-4b1ed56ae41c
X-Archives-Hash: 5adbb29509c733887b42156147b91338

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> What a pity though -- you just don't get 1400x1050 laptops anymore these days
> (or any 4:3 laptops for that matter).

I also have a 1400x1050 (15-inch screen) laptop and I think this
resolution and screen size are hitting the sweet-spot for a 4:3
monitor of that size...