From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-142389-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923451381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed,  7 Nov 2012 21:07:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94F2621C08D;
	Wed,  7 Nov 2012 21:07:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4BC21C063
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  7 Nov 2012 21:06:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id gg6so1627189lbb.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:06:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=hYazrt7LoFDMXbgdjqu0Lms8FSpwck25ymYPV3tggiM=;
        b=Iy6qqNzjPHgT0DMIIVFMbXbxpKi5YYx5eKKwgnFWzAs/cSDzyhamCvUY6XYntxSKGy
         bIa9Mz7bwQloxaBPzdAZdDEySv9W3shCH8j87nJLyZx6inLnp6XekSkQa0YK4IT+wioQ
         M6DtYT5PJYtuehYCHlwKdd/DjkJKnbvNzIy6AOvs7j/gEbZC1L/klyHaldasSufCdcoj
         RYTsRicSMQHvXC+dwWFf1piPXxJ9OIrkcEoES4CfzIWUu7E0pBOq4xzmjnaxQjC9+gO2
         i1umHGA1D1O++j9r8CgR5W80r/qLnFM+PfeYjk9FMFMpFbuumG3GwIDlWzQDH5bporwl
         0WPA==
Received: by 10.152.108.37 with SMTP id hh5mr5468486lab.52.1352322381692; Wed,
 07 Nov 2012 13:06:21 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.9.9 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:06:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <k7bd66$jml$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <5097B6DF.9040900@xunil.at> <CAGK8UzDuWPC0rBeabEj6h4p2fKQz-iz_i_JZPqmppX0o2+vAMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <509807D5.7060301@xunil.at> <2430261.ngY0QH2qYk@energy> <50982369.4010608@xunil.at>
 <20121106000136.00201fc2@khamul.example.com> <k7b5hd$qb$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <20121106170317.2dc5b1de@khamul.example.com> <k7bd66$jml$1@ger.gmane.org>
From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:06:01 -0600
X-Google-Sender-Auth: REsh6-gRhR96inVge1dRNF58g-0
Message-ID: <CAEH5T2NuPDBj75Wd+tAfMxE2oft_Latwes_wFo-D7vpmV=qfVw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: (double)click
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 61772df6-f6e1-495b-9e73-7d1684012642
X-Archives-Hash: 9009eb76d6d8b432d1c35a3f4fccad51

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Grant Edwards
<grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>    http://www.pckeyboard.com/
>
> I was thrilled when I saw they offered a "spacesaver M" model.  I
> thought it was going to be a clone of the IBM 84-key model M "space
> saver" that IBM sold back in 87-89.
>
> Nope.  It's the same desk-hogging size as a regular M -- not really
> sure where the "space saving" comes from.

I have both the classic and spacesaver models and the spacesaver is
definitely smaller. The size of the keys/keyboard layout are the same,
however, it's the size of the casing that is different. There is more
area to left and right and a much larger area to the north of the
function keys. The classic weighs about ~1 pound more than the
spacesaver, too. Compared to any other modern keyboard the spacesaver
is probably the same or bigger, though. But my point is that the
original is huge. :)