From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-138124-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SSBsZ-0006RA-ML
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 May 2012 18:44:51 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E281E0667;
	Wed,  9 May 2012 18:44:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4871DE05D7
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  9 May 2012 18:42:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lagu2 with SMTP id u2so510641lag.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 09 May 2012 11:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=hcLGQg0Mxg0LFRv3CfmjGvt8Eei+uI/HTqOl7WwVsAo=;
        b=PxhLF533EoK1Aa7kXXHCyl41O4LmaJTNC55xwsTysUyO3LpW4oJzsN7ZpamTl2aw0V
         XE4x6yuQvQpQGXtqUtDUZ39+JeZKxY575uDJywR0i26LNY54HnuqM/JgcHBH+FTutr+w
         9TmbETvcWBQiDuv9qOX7EQEfSjUBDAURV/+CYjDkva881zZzYacPV/DApPN96WF59fun
         1Mk2Tzbvegoh4xJi/moiOEoz0R65JHoOGfUaJ49+kDfi25Lo/IkRlzom/CM6jxDatGwX
         bA4Ox2plLFFeJ2tniCvK6V4GioZIgdZMeEy56ggOc02MMCB8SjFu4W4sRGjwL0LofcQH
         T64g==
Received: by 10.112.38.70 with SMTP id e6mr565568lbk.6.1336588957235; Wed, 09
 May 2012 11:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.35.108 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 11:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK2H+efKuggsQSeph2fgJ437vVgz1HyCZT_byUgVrr-MicDMJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4FAA2F0D.8080900@gmail.com> <4FAA595A.4040202@libertytrek.org>
 <CAK2H+ec30vQ09U22vAc72hSQBJb2ZN5b25snH6-D3cDXrReHSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA2qdGW8UuF3H-CBiqn48f+Pboj3AhCT2WhDd1SwzE-g7z_MJg@mail.gmail.com> <CAK2H+efKuggsQSeph2fgJ437vVgz1HyCZT_byUgVrr-MicDMJg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 13:42:17 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4QScPA8Mm8pvwBUiOq6u-iBEb5E
Message-ID: <CAEH5T2N_JAZDv2Ek9M10JFcFuMafUG4vQ5ZhDdJ_qh2Hh2VRJw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: df5017f0-cd34-4f21-a899-f2c2215b224c
X-Archives-Hash: a096335cc8ad96c286c270a8f9802298

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> The best answer at the time was some piece of low level software from
> WD called something like wdtwiddle or something

WDTLER  :)